Thompson-Nelson revisited

Wrists
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1281
Joined: 09 May 2005, 12:13

Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited

Post by Wrists »

I am chilled.

You're transparent

Enjoy
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3172
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited

Post by deadpan »

twenty six, I have no anti-Sheffield bias whatsoever. I live there. :TU:
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited

Post by Jon Saxon »

Wrists wrote:I am chilled.

You're transparent

Enjoy
That's far to complimentary.
Final round
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4911
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02

Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited

Post by Final round »

twenty six wrote:In addition, can anyne tell me why it is consistantly Sheffield boxers that come in for this type of criticism ?
The opening thread also has a carp at another Sheffield lad, Naz.
For a boring boxer who not many rated, Johnny isn't half getting the column inches.
If not this, it's his kidnap threat from 9 years ago.
Then there's the thread about a wife staring at his thighs :roll:
I would much rather re visit for instance the absolute travesty of Jimmy Vincent v David Barnes where a rematch WAS ordered but never took place.
I wonder why.
I think Johnny probably gets a fair bit more interest than he has for a while because the ringside show has put him back in the public eye.
Jon Saxon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1657
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 16:16

Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited

Post by Jon Saxon »

Final round wrote:
twenty six wrote:In addition, can anyne tell me why it is consistantly Sheffield boxers that come in for this type of criticism ?
The opening thread also has a carp at another Sheffield lad, Naz.
For a boring boxer who not many rated, Johnny isn't half getting the column inches.
If not this, it's his kidnap threat from 9 years ago.
Then there's the thread about a wife staring at his thighs :roll:
I would much rather re visit for instance the absolute travesty of Jimmy Vincent v David Barnes where a rematch WAS ordered but never took place.
I wonder why.
I think Johnny probably gets a fair bit more interest than he has for a while because the ringside show has put him back in the public eye.

I'm glad he got the gig, he seems like such a nice guy, kinda like the Gary Lineker of boxing.
ArtOfWar
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1253
Joined: 24 Oct 2003, 11:54

Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited

Post by ArtOfWar »

black panther wrote:
twenty six wrote:Art,
So the failed drugs test, proving Jones was on performance hencing drugs is of no importance then ?
Still think it was robbery, or do you prefer drugs cheats ?
By the way, as the fight was a draw, how is that worse than Thompson losing ?
Worse in that Thompson looked like he was going to lose the fight and although you can argue about the stoppage, no way could you argue that Thompson was winning that fight. The Jones decision was a disgrace. Sure it would have been declared a NC following the drugs test, but it still doesn't make it right that it was scored so badly.
That answers it for me.
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3172
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited

Post by deadpan »

Thompson wasn't winning the first three rounds of the Haye fight either. Or at virtually any point of the Rothmann fight.
DavidPayne
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6248
Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00

Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited

Post by DavidPayne »

The highlight of this weeks BN, Johnny Nelson stating that the WBO were the worst of the sanctioning bodies.

Hell fire.
Post Reply