I am chilled.
You're transparent
Enjoy
Thompson-Nelson revisited
Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited
twenty six, I have no anti-Sheffield bias whatsoever. I live there. 
Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited
That's far to complimentary.Wrists wrote:I am chilled.
You're transparent
Enjoy
-
Final round
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 17:02
Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited
I think Johnny probably gets a fair bit more interest than he has for a while because the ringside show has put him back in the public eye.twenty six wrote:In addition, can anyne tell me why it is consistantly Sheffield boxers that come in for this type of criticism ?
The opening thread also has a carp at another Sheffield lad, Naz.
For a boring boxer who not many rated, Johnny isn't half getting the column inches.
If not this, it's his kidnap threat from 9 years ago.
Then there's the thread about a wife staring at his thighs![]()
I would much rather re visit for instance the absolute travesty of Jimmy Vincent v David Barnes where a rematch WAS ordered but never took place.
I wonder why.
Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited
Final round wrote:I think Johnny probably gets a fair bit more interest than he has for a while because the ringside show has put him back in the public eye.twenty six wrote:In addition, can anyne tell me why it is consistantly Sheffield boxers that come in for this type of criticism ?
The opening thread also has a carp at another Sheffield lad, Naz.
For a boring boxer who not many rated, Johnny isn't half getting the column inches.
If not this, it's his kidnap threat from 9 years ago.
Then there's the thread about a wife staring at his thighs![]()
I would much rather re visit for instance the absolute travesty of Jimmy Vincent v David Barnes where a rematch WAS ordered but never took place.
I wonder why.
I'm glad he got the gig, he seems like such a nice guy, kinda like the Gary Lineker of boxing.
Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited
That answers it for me.black panther wrote:Worse in that Thompson looked like he was going to lose the fight and although you can argue about the stoppage, no way could you argue that Thompson was winning that fight. The Jones decision was a disgrace. Sure it would have been declared a NC following the drugs test, but it still doesn't make it right that it was scored so badly.twenty six wrote:Art,
So the failed drugs test, proving Jones was on performance hencing drugs is of no importance then ?
Still think it was robbery, or do you prefer drugs cheats ?
By the way, as the fight was a draw, how is that worse than Thompson losing ?
Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited
Thompson wasn't winning the first three rounds of the Haye fight either. Or at virtually any point of the Rothmann fight.
-
DavidPayne
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 6248
- Joined: 11 Mar 2004, 11:00
Re: Thompson-Nelson revisited
The highlight of this weeks BN, Johnny Nelson stating that the WBO were the worst of the sanctioning bodies.
Hell fire.
Hell fire.