Arreola has NO CHANCE IN HELL!!!!! ... That's what they like, super easy defunct opponents with a name.. If Stiverne out-boxed Arreola 14 of 18 rounds... and Wilder out-boxed Stiverne 12 out of 12 rounds - it goes to show what a miserable boxer Chris is...and if he couldn't get rid of Fred Kassi or Curtis Harper he's not even a real good puncher.. Harper was knocked out twice before by guys who aren't impressive finishers. He really doesn't have enough experience to be called a journeyman. He was picked to get Arreola an easy win ... and he has 2 wins in his last 6 fights. So Arreola has in NO WAY fought his way into a title contention... This is a business fight and Boxing is a business.keithmoonhangover wrote:If Arreola shows up focused, he has a real chance in the first 2 rounds.
Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
I remembered thinking the Kassi fight should've been a draw for Arreola and the Curtis Harper fight I only had Arreola winning by 1 point.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
I've always known he was awful. Funniest part is if he was in condition he would be a ponderously slow Light Heavy or Cruiser. Never would have done anything.gilgamesh wrote:I remembered thinking the Kassi fight should've been a draw for Arreola and the Curtis Harper fight I only had Arreola winning by 1 point.
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
All you need to do is watch the Takam and Perez fights. It was obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells what Povetkin was up to after seeing those fights.asdfjkl wrote:Wrong, all parties except Povetkin are wrong actually.caldo2025 wrote:Way to harsh of a reaction for both guys in this forum. Wilder had a big fight yanked from him late so he had to turn that into a "stay busy" fight" so why not go with a guy that has notoriety and a good amount of followers. I know Arreola is limited but i've watched him for years and i find him entertaining. What do people expect? Wilder to schedule a fight with Ortiz or Joshua and train for them for 3 weeks? No promotional marketing? It's silly.
Arreola's poured his heart out in the ring for years and come a long way with limited ability. I don't care about the failed tests, the guys put it on the line for years and come short. I'd much see a guy like him get a shot then some unknown young punk that hasn't shed a drop of blood in the ring yet.
Go easy here people. The only one to blame for this is Povetkin.
Povetkin followed all the rules that have been written. Wada and Vada both don't know details about meldonium, but still put it on their illegal substances list and next to that, it hasn't even been proved that it has any positive results on athletes at all and they don't even know how long it takes to completely leave the body. That's why retards write that Povetkin used illegal substances, but in fact he stopped as soon as it became illegal. Actually, if he wanted to use meldonium, he simply accepted the fight in januari and was allowed to have well over 200 times as much meldonium in his body as he actually had. The WBC somehow wants Wada and Vada for odd reasons, probably because they don't have a clue what they are doing as well and Wilder and his team will get sued for blackmailing Povetkin time on time again saying Povetkin is a cheater, while he continually proves and proved he isn't, unlike Wilder btw. Meanwhile Wilder is going to fight someone who clearly did use illegal substances quite recently, a guy that actually did cheat, but appearantly that's not a problem.
In short, it barely matters what party involved you name, all of them can be blamed, except Povetkin.
And how exactly is Wilder more suspicious than Povetkin?
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
gilgamesh wrote:I remembered thinking the Kassi fight should've been a draw for Arreola and the Curtis Harper fight I only had Arreola winning by 1 point.
I still like Wilder, but it is a pathetic fight for Wilder to take, even though Povetkin's problems aren't Wilder's fault.
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
The only significant fight of his where I favored him going in was the first Stiverne fight I'm pretty sure, mainly because Stiverne had lost every round to Ray Austin before knocking him out so I was convinced Stiverne was garbage...still am. Turns out Arreola was even worse.SaadOffTheDeck wrote:I've always known he was awful. Funniest part is if he was in condition he would be a ponderously slow Light Heavy or Cruiser. Never would have done anything.gilgamesh wrote:I remembered thinking the Kassi fight should've been a draw for Arreola and the Curtis Harper fight I only had Arreola winning by 1 point.
It's a shame for Travis Kauffman that he lost a split decision to Arreola which was then turned to a NC. I personally thought Kauffman won the fight. Only by a point though.
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
I'll never like Wilder I don't think. His entire career is built on scraping the bottom of the barrel, and having an impressive KO percentage, but it's all built up against sh*t competition. This is going to be his 4th WBC Title defense, and he still has only fought ONE Top 10 opponent. I don't know if there's any other titleholder in Boxing that just gets to avoid all noteworthy competition everytime like that.Tony1244 wrote:gilgamesh wrote:I remembered thinking the Kassi fight should've been a draw for Arreola and the Curtis Harper fight I only had Arreola winning by 1 point.
I still like Wilder, but it is a pathetic fight for Wilder to take, even though Povetkin's problems aren't Wilder's fault.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
If they fight frequently they can. Nothing he could do here. I'm not a fan either, but this is entirely on Povetkin.gilgamesh wrote:I'll never like Wilder I don't think. His entire career is built on scraping the bottom of the barrel, and having an impressive KO percentage, but it's all built up against sh*t competition. This is going to be his 4th WBC Title defense, and he still has only fought ONE Top 10 opponent. I don't know if there's any other titleholder in Boxing that just gets to avoid all noteworthy competition everytime like that.Tony1244 wrote:gilgamesh wrote:I remembered thinking the Kassi fight should've been a draw for Arreola and the Curtis Harper fight I only had Arreola winning by 1 point.
I still like Wilder, but it is a pathetic fight for Wilder to take, even though Povetkin's problems aren't Wilder's fault.
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
I know Povetkin is the one that f*cked it up, but it still annoys me. Wilder's 5th defenses is gonna be someone not Top 10 to. I'd just about guarantee it.
He's gonna reach for the low hanging fruit everytime if he can. I wouldn't doubt his 5th defense is Charles Martin or something.
He's gonna reach for the low hanging fruit everytime if he can. I wouldn't doubt his 5th defense is Charles Martin or something.
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
I think he'll be forced to fight a mandatory in his 5th defence, or at least in his 6th. Or he may go for the Fury/Klitchsko winner. It's so annoying he isn't fighting any top 10 guys. All of the potential fights between Wilder and the other top 10 guys (minus Stiverne and maybe Jennings) look so appetising on paper.gilgamesh wrote:I know Povetkin is the one that f*cked it up, but it still annoys me. Wilder's 5th defenses is gonna be someone not Top 10 to. I'd just about guarantee it.
He's gonna reach for the low hanging fruit everytime if he can. I wouldn't doubt his 5th defense is Charles Martin or something.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
Nah, he wants to step up. Though you never know who the WBC is going to make his mandatory. Could well be Martin.gilgamesh wrote:I know Povetkin is the one that f*cked it up, but it still annoys me. Wilder's 5th defenses is gonna be someone not Top 10 to. I'd just about guarantee it.
He's gonna reach for the low hanging fruit everytime if he can. I wouldn't doubt his 5th defense is Charles Martin or something.
-
bigman1968
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 672
- Joined: 24 Jul 2014, 03:45
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
Former IBF HW Champion of the World, Charles Martin-))))))SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Nah, he wants to step up. Though you never know who the WBC is going to make his mandatory. Could well be Martin.gilgamesh wrote:I know Povetkin is the one that f*cked it up, but it still annoys me. Wilder's 5th defenses is gonna be someone not Top 10 to. I'd just about guarantee it.
He's gonna reach for the low hanging fruit everytime if he can. I wouldn't doubt his 5th defense is Charles Martin or something.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
Povetkin allways had great stamina, just look at him against Klitschko, he just kept on going going going, no matter how much Klitschko clinched.Killer Blow wrote:All you need to do is watch the Takam and Perez fights. It was obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells what Povetkin was up to after seeing those fights.asdfjkl wrote:Wrong, all parties except Povetkin are wrong actually.caldo2025 wrote:Way to harsh of a reaction for both guys in this forum. Wilder had a big fight yanked from him late so he had to turn that into a "stay busy" fight" so why not go with a guy that has notoriety and a good amount of followers. I know Arreola is limited but i've watched him for years and i find him entertaining. What do people expect? Wilder to schedule a fight with Ortiz or Joshua and train for them for 3 weeks? No promotional marketing? It's silly.
Arreola's poured his heart out in the ring for years and come a long way with limited ability. I don't care about the failed tests, the guys put it on the line for years and come short. I'd much see a guy like him get a shot then some unknown young punk that hasn't shed a drop of blood in the ring yet.
Go easy here people. The only one to blame for this is Povetkin.
Povetkin followed all the rules that have been written. Wada and Vada both don't know details about meldonium, but still put it on their illegal substances list and next to that, it hasn't even been proved that it has any positive results on athletes at all and they don't even know how long it takes to completely leave the body. That's why retards write that Povetkin used illegal substances, but in fact he stopped as soon as it became illegal. Actually, if he wanted to use meldonium, he simply accepted the fight in januari and was allowed to have well over 200 times as much meldonium in his body as he actually had. The WBC somehow wants Wada and Vada for odd reasons, probably because they don't have a clue what they are doing as well and Wilder and his team will get sued for blackmailing Povetkin time on time again saying Povetkin is a cheater, while he continually proves and proved he isn't, unlike Wilder btw. Meanwhile Wilder is going to fight someone who clearly did use illegal substances quite recently, a guy that actually did cheat, but appearantly that's not a problem.
In short, it barely matters what party involved you name, all of them can be blamed, except Povetkin.
And how exactly is Wilder more suspicious than Povetkin?
And about Wilder, I don't think he's a drugsuser, despite him all of a sudden gaining quite a lot of pounds recently. But I do somehow wonder why there have never been testresults around the Szpilka fight, not before the fight, not after, as far as I know never actually, despite Szpilka asking for it several times.
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
gilgamesh wrote:I'll never like Wilder I don't think. His entire career is built on scraping the bottom of the barrel, and having an impressive KO percentage, but it's all built up against sh*t competition. This is going to be his 4th WBC Title defense, and he still has only fought ONE Top 10 opponent. I don't know if there's any other titleholder in Boxing that just gets to avoid all noteworthy competition everytime like that.Tony1244 wrote:gilgamesh wrote:I remembered thinking the Kassi fight should've been a draw for Arreola and the Curtis Harper fight I only had Arreola winning by 1 point.
I still like Wilder, but it is a pathetic fight for Wilder to take, even though Povetkin's problems aren't Wilder's fault.
My feelings on Wilder are somewhat mixed. I like almost all Heavyweights who can Hit, so he gets off to a good start with me, but he has been ridiculously overly protected.
Povetkin was going to be a great test which is why we are all so disappointed in the cancellation or postponement or whatever they're calling it now.
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:If they fight frequently they can. Nothing he could do here. I'm not a fan either, but this is entirely on Povetkin.gilgamesh wrote:I'll never like Wilder I don't think. His entire career is built on scraping the bottom of the barrel, and having an impressive KO percentage, but it's all built up against sh*t competition. This is going to be his 4th WBC Title defense, and he still has only fought ONE Top 10 opponent. I don't know if there's any other titleholder in Boxing that just gets to avoid all noteworthy competition everytime like that.Tony1244 wrote:
I still like Wilder, but it is a pathetic fight for Wilder to take, even though Povetkin's problems aren't Wilder's fault.
It is entirely on Povetkin to the best of my knowledge. Doesn't mean I'm going to say Arreola is suitable, he isn't. But I'll still watch. Hell, I'd watch if Wilder fought SaadOffTheDeck or gilgameish.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16892
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
Where's your proof of basketball skills transferring to boxing? Are you going to admit you don't have any?Kalan wrote:Arreola has NO CHANCE IN HELL!!!!! ... That's what they like, super easy defunct opponents with a name.. If Stiverne out-boxed Arreola 14 of 18 rounds... and Wilder out-boxed Stiverne 12 out of 12 rounds - it goes to show what a miserable boxer Chris is...and if he couldn't get rid of Fred Kassi or Curtis Harper he's not even a real good puncher.. Harper was knocked out twice before by guys who aren't impressive finishers. He really doesn't have enough experience to be called a journeyman. He was picked to get Arreola an easy win ... and he has 2 wins in his last 6 fights. So Arreola has in NO WAY fought his way into a title contention... This is a business fight and Boxing is a business.keithmoonhangover wrote:If Arreola shows up focused, he has a real chance in the first 2 rounds.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
Tony1244 wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:If they fight frequently they can. Nothing he could do here. I'm not a fan either, but this is entirely on Povetkin.gilgamesh wrote:
I'll never like Wilder I don't think. His entire career is built on scraping the bottom of the barrel, and having an impressive KO percentage, but it's all built up against sh*t competition. This is going to be his 4th WBC Title defense, and he still has only fought ONE Top 10 opponent. I don't know if there's any other titleholder in Boxing that just gets to avoid all noteworthy competition everytime like that.
It is entirely on Povetkin to the best of my knowledge. Doesn't mean I'm going to say Arreola is suitable, he isn't. But I'll still watch. Hell, I'd watch if Wilder fought SaadOffTheDeck or gilgameish.
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Tony1244 wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
If they fight frequently they can. Nothing he could do here. I'm not a fan either, but this is entirely on Povetkin.
It is entirely on Povetkin to the best of my knowledge. Doesn't mean I'm going to say Arreola is suitable, he isn't. But I'll still watch. Hell, I'd watch if Wilder fought SaadOffTheDeck or gilgameish.
How old are you 6? Every time I don't agree with you 100% you send out a Smile. You likely have as many friends as your hero Ted Cruz. Wilder should be given credit for staying active but Arreola is a joke of an opponent.
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
Povetkin has always been a great boxer, but his power significantly improved after the Klitschko fight. Other heavyweights publicly accused him of doping, including one of his opponents.asdfjkl wrote:Povetkin allways had great stamina, just look at him against Klitschko, he just kept on going going going, no matter how much Klitschko clinched.Killer Blow wrote:All you need to do is watch the Takam and Perez fights. It was obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells what Povetkin was up to after seeing those fights.asdfjkl wrote: Wrong, all parties except Povetkin are wrong actually.
Povetkin followed all the rules that have been written. Wada and Vada both don't know details about meldonium, but still put it on their illegal substances list and next to that, it hasn't even been proved that it has any positive results on athletes at all and they don't even know how long it takes to completely leave the body. That's why retards write that Povetkin used illegal substances, but in fact he stopped as soon as it became illegal. Actually, if he wanted to use meldonium, he simply accepted the fight in januari and was allowed to have well over 200 times as much meldonium in his body as he actually had. The WBC somehow wants Wada and Vada for odd reasons, probably because they don't have a clue what they are doing as well and Wilder and his team will get sued for blackmailing Povetkin time on time again saying Povetkin is a cheater, while he continually proves and proved he isn't, unlike Wilder btw. Meanwhile Wilder is going to fight someone who clearly did use illegal substances quite recently, a guy that actually did cheat, but appearantly that's not a problem.
In short, it barely matters what party involved you name, all of them can be blamed, except Povetkin.
And how exactly is Wilder more suspicious than Povetkin?
And about Wilder, I don't think he's a drugsuser, despite him all of a sudden gaining quite a lot of pounds recently. But I do somehow wonder why there have never been testresults around the Szpilka fight, not before the fight, not after, as far as I know never actually, despite Szpilka asking for it several times.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
Only Wilder did, as an excuse to avoid fighting him. It took Povetkin several years to achieve that strength and it wasn't like he's that muscled now, or that weak at the time.Killer Blow wrote:Povetkin has always been a great boxer, but his power significantly improved after the Klitschko fight. Other heavyweights publicly accused him of doping, including one of his opponents.asdfjkl wrote:Povetkin allways had great stamina, just look at him against Klitschko, he just kept on going going going, no matter how much Klitschko clinched.Killer Blow wrote:
All you need to do is watch the Takam and Perez fights. It was obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells what Povetkin was up to after seeing those fights.
And how exactly is Wilder more suspicious than Povetkin?
And about Wilder, I don't think he's a drugsuser, despite him all of a sudden gaining quite a lot of pounds recently. But I do somehow wonder why there have never been testresults around the Szpilka fight, not before the fight, not after, as far as I know never actually, despite Szpilka asking for it several times.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
Tony1244 wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Tony1244 wrote:
It is entirely on Povetkin to the best of my knowledge. Doesn't mean I'm going to say Arreola is suitable, he isn't. But I'll still watch. Hell, I'd watch if Wilder fought SaadOffTheDeck or gilgameish.
How old are you 6? Every time I don't agree with you 100% you send out a Smile. You likely have as many friends as your hero Ted Cruz. Wilder should be given credit for staying active but Arreola is a joke of an opponent.
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Tony1244 wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
How old are you 6? Every time I don't agree with you 100% you send out a Smile. You likely have as many friends as your hero Ted Cruz. Wilder should be given credit for staying active but Arreola is a joke of an opponent.
You and Andrew Kearney should have an insecurity contest. That would be a pick'em if there ever was a pick'em.
-
Killer Blow
- Welterweight
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 01 May 2016, 05:07
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
Takam and others were also suspicious of him.asdfjkl wrote:Only Wilder did, as an excuse to avoid fighting him. It took Povetkin several years to achieve that strength and it wasn't like he's that muscled now, or that weak at the time.Killer Blow wrote:Povetkin has always been a great boxer, but his power significantly improved after the Klitschko fight. Other heavyweights publicly accused him of doping, including one of his opponents.asdfjkl wrote: Povetkin allways had great stamina, just look at him against Klitschko, he just kept on going going going, no matter how much Klitschko clinched.
And about Wilder, I don't think he's a drugsuser, despite him all of a sudden gaining quite a lot of pounds recently. But I do somehow wonder why there have never been testresults around the Szpilka fight, not before the fight, not after, as far as I know never actually, despite Szpilka asking for it several times.
-
SaadOffTheDeck
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 19602
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
Tony1244 wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Tony1244 wrote:
How old are you 6? Every time I don't agree with you 100% you send out a Smile. You likely have as many friends as your hero Ted Cruz. Wilder should be given credit for staying active but Arreola is a joke of an opponent.
You and Andrew Kearney should have an insecurity contest. That would be a pick'em if there ever was a pick'em.
Re: Wilder vs Arreola apparently on for July 16th
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Tony1244 wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
You and Andrew Kearney should have an insecurity contest. That would be a pick'em if there ever was a pick'em.
Considering you have given me 8 of those yes you do care. You're like a little girl who keeps claiming she doesn't have a crush on her little boyfriend. Give me another one and go for #9.
Yes your little Arreola is a horrible opponent.