Fury Fight Off

ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

95gerog wrote:
clopixolacuphase wrote:
ILikeBeer wrote:The real question is, did anybody care about this fight in the first place?
Well, loads of us obviously.

I hadn't booked the travel lodge yet as I am wary of The Curse of the Big Fight. I was meaning to do it soon though, so glad I am a useless coin and keep on forgetting to do important things.

I'd booked but luckily completely refundable. I can't wait for this. I'm impressed by fury for returning the favour with this stunt.
Where did you see it is completely refundable?
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by expe »

Rockys gum shield wrote:£350 for lower tier tickets!!

The prices were robbery and defo the reason this fight has been called off in my opinion, the ankle just offered up a good excuse.
There were lower tier tickets at £500, £526 with booking fees, which is the sort of price I'd expect for VIP unless there was a top undercard.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23139
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by mickey1975 »

expe wrote:
Rockys gum shield wrote:£350 for lower tier tickets!!

The prices were robbery and defo the reason this fight has been called off in my opinion, the ankle just offered up a good excuse.
There were lower tier tickets at £500, £526 with booking fees, which is the sort of price I'd expect for VIP unless there was a top undercard.
My £200 Quigg-Frampton ticket was £500+fees for this.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by SenorPipino »

I wonder where Fury got the sudden inspiration in the last day to pull out of The Big Fight?

It suspiciously sounds like another case of BREXIT.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23139
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by mickey1975 »

Tyson hasn't been right at all from the very announcement of this fight, and it wasn't him doing it for the media. John disappearing, Peter being very quiet except making a stupid video, the outbursts....
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by SenorPipino »

BTW, amigos, Dan Rafael, the sharp boxing scribe who also works for ESPN, has reported on the network that several sources very close to the fight have told him that Fury was simply not prepared to take on Klitschko in a few weeks.

To quote, "Fury, who has partied hard, has been seen drinking in public and appeared out of shape since winning the title, even grabbing his gut at a recent press event promoting the fight."

So does Fury's ankle hurt?

Probably, but boxers suffer injuries constantly in training. Sometimes they pull out, but most often they suck it up and keep their commitment.

Because he was grossly out of shape for the fight in 2 weeks, Fury obviously decided that the tender ankle would sound like a good excuse to cancel the bout.

If he doesn't buckle down and recognize what it takes to be (and remain a champion) it's unlikely he'll consider taking on Klitschko in October.

He'll miss out on too many wild nights.
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Fat Boy Dan Rafael never misses a chance to have a pop at British boxers, and should be ignored IMO.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by TheCobra »

Shame really. Fury's a strange bloke and I genuinely believe that his head just wasn't right for this one. There's an argument that he just couldn't be arsed and just decided to be awkward and mess Klitschko about, possibly as revenge for Klitschko messing him about previously with his own pullout and also the other times Fury has been really messed about (twice by haye). Maybe just using his one bit of power to be an asshole.
SenorPipino
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6055
Joined: 09 Jan 2013, 19:40

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by SenorPipino »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote:Fat Boy Dan Rafael never misses a chance to have a pop at British boxers, and should be ignored IMO.
Your whining at a respected American journalist sounds like you acquired the sour taste in Jack Bodell's pop.

He used to rail about "biased" Yank writers too. Finally an American set him straight.

Jerry Quarry (KO 1) Jack Bodell.

Enjoy your newfound independence, mate.
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

Thanks Dan
ted822
Welterweight
Posts: 23
Joined: 08 Apr 2016, 08:54

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by ted822 »

SenorPipino wrote:BTW, amigos, Dan Rafael, the sharp boxing scribe who also works for ESPN, has reported on the network that several sources very close to the fight have told him that Fury was simply not prepared to take on Klitschko in a few weeks.

To quote, "Fury, who has partied hard, has been seen drinking in public and appeared out of shape since winning the title, even grabbing his gut at a recent press event promoting the fight."

So does Fury's ankle hurt?

Probably, but boxers suffer injuries constantly in training. Sometimes they pull out, but most often they suck it up and keep their commitment.

Because he was grossly out of shape for the fight in 2 weeks, Fury obviously decided that the tender ankle would sound like a good excuse to cancel the bout.

If he doesn't buckle down and recognize what it takes to be (and remain a champion) it's unlikely he'll consider taking on Klitschko in October.

He'll miss out on too many wild nights.
Sadly I think you may have something there mate.
tsmithy50
Cruiserweight
Posts: 601
Joined: 09 Sep 2010, 09:42

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by tsmithy50 »

Fury doesn't want to fight Klitsko again, I don't think he even really wants to fight again. Maybe when he's skint, in his eyes he's done his bit, achieved his goals. He beat Klitscho fair and square last time though. No one can take that away from him. Big money fight with AJ, why not? Take a beating and 10 million quid plus. That's the way he should be pushed, train and plenty of his pre fight bullshit.
Monte Fisto
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2978
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 15:36

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by Monte Fisto »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:
95gerog wrote:
clopixolacuphase wrote: Well, loads of us obviously.

I hadn't booked the travel lodge yet as I am wary of The Curse of the Big Fight. I was meaning to do it soon though, so glad I am a useless coin and keep on forgetting to do important things.

I'd booked but luckily completely refundable. I can't wait for this. I'm impressed by fury for returning the favour with this stunt.
Where did you see it is completely refundable?
was talking about my accommodation.
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by magwitch »

Taansend wrote:He says It happened TEN days ago.

When was that rave?

https://youtu.be/GJqvkazhUIg

Sounds very similar to a bad one I did playing football. Didn’t fall over but got my ankle hyper-extended by blocking a shot from point blank range. After 6 X-rays the doctor said there was “no damage” :lol: :lol: .........by which he can only have meant it wasn’t broken.

Tyson is a very big fella and there’s a lot of very beautiful yet uneven places to run in the Lakes - he’ll have to be careful.

From memory mine was getting on for 3 months and probably more like 4 before I was playing again.

Sorry for the long post too but this affects the weight too. He needs to be careful what he puts away for 3 months here......steady on the Eccles cakes Tyson! GWS. :TU:
BigRed
Cruiserweight
Posts: 162
Joined: 17 Feb 2011, 12:57

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by BigRed »

How's that ankle tyson?? Seems to be OK for jumping around last night.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... 6128657264
Switch hitter
Middleweight
Posts: 590
Joined: 09 Aug 2014, 07:43

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by Switch hitter »

Looks in shape though.....maybe it's a genuine injury ....you never know stranger things have happened.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by lefty »

BigRed wrote:How's that ankle tyson?? Seems to be OK for jumping around last night.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... 6128657264
It seems like his heart isnt in it.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

Used to like fury want my money back. Still going to Manchester for a night out not bothered with the rescheduled whenever that happens!
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23139
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by mickey1975 »

lefty wrote:
BigRed wrote:How's that ankle tyson?? Seems to be OK for jumping around last night.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... 6128657264
It seems like his heart isnt in it.
Well observed, lefty.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by lefty »

mickey1975 wrote:
lefty wrote:
BigRed wrote:How's that ankle tyson?? Seems to be OK for jumping around last night.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... 6128657264
It seems like his heart isnt in it.
Well observed, lefty.
You're probably just being sarcastic there :lol: but either way, maybe he should just pack it in if he isnt interested anymore. He must have made a decent amount of coin from the first fight that he could set himself up with but I don't know.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by Andrew »

Had tickets for this and was absolutely gutted.


Become so disillusioned with the sport the last couple of months I don't give a care about the rescheduled date now and want a refund my best mate is the same. I don't think it happens in Manchester anyway.
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6697
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by Kilburn »

Just curious, given the awful spectacle we got last time what were ticket holders hoping to see second time round? Presumably a more aggressive Vladimir.
BobD'Mello
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 126
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 06:29

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by BobD'Mello »

Heard a rumour that there's going to be a big development tomorrow re: Fury. Not sure how legit it is but if it is true, sounds like it could be very interesting.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by bripez »

mickey1975 wrote:
lefty wrote:
BigRed wrote:How's that ankle tyson?? Seems to be OK for jumping around last night.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... 6128657264
It seems like his heart isnt in it.
Well observed, lefty.
Apart from the boxing and injury he looks like a middle aged bloke who has gatecrashed a teenagers disco and is trying to be cool in front of his pretend mates.

Kiltschko is a big draw in Germany - this is clearly an agreed delay to get the fight moved over there due to poor ticket sales (you know, because the British general public are too busy voting for brexit to care about a fighting gypsy warrior).
Exoddus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1517
Joined: 08 Oct 2007, 10:30

Re: Fury Fight Off

Post by Exoddus »

lefty wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:
lefty wrote: It seems like his heart isnt in it.
Well observed, lefty.
You're probably just being sarcastic there :lol: but either way, maybe he should just pack it in if he isnt interested anymore. He must have made a decent amount of coin from the first fight that he could set himself up with but I don't know.
Breach of contract. It would cost him millions if he doesn't fight Wlad.
Post Reply