Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Parson Cross
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 18:57

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Parson Cross »

Stand by all the haters become lovers.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by lefty »

Parson Cross wrote:Stand by all the haters become lovers.
I've given my props mate.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Cyclops »

Just got a phone call off a mate to tell me this!

Holy crap. Fair play to Brook he is a big welter and can probably do MW with the right training camp. It's not like Khan, who turned over at LW, fighting Canelo. I'd expect Kell and GGG to probably weigh about the same in the ring.

Eubank jnr vs Saunders 2 on the undercard, anybody?
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Horse »

Parson Cross wrote:Stand by all the haters become lovers.
I'll love watching Brook get smeared all over the canvas.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by lillywhite14 »

:o
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by lefty »

clopixolacuphase wrote:Just got a phone call off a mate to tell me this!

Holy crap. Fair play to Brook he is a big welter and can probably do MW with the right training camp. It's not like Khan, who turned over at LW, fighting Canelo. I'd expect Kell and GGG to probably weigh about the same in the ring.

Eubank jnr vs Saunders 2 on the undercard, anybody?
Not sure how the latter is gonna happen with Saunders with Fwank.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Wow, unbelievable news. No arguments about Brook's ambitions now if this goes ahead. He will get destroyed, but credit to him for taking this.
Supremo
Super Middleweight
Posts: 698
Joined: 12 May 2013, 04:46

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Supremo »

I am going to go to this and take the chance to see two excellent/great boxer even though the weight issue will make it an uneven match.
Fair play to brook and Hearn- about fuckjng time.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by lefty »

The only possible negative of this fight is will probably not see Brook at welterweight again to fight the likes of Thurman and co.

I might actually put money on Brook though depending on what the odds look like.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Boxing Prospect wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Boxing Prospect wrote:"Eddie you fucked up by not getting Brook Vs Vargas or GGG vs Golovkin, you'll have to give us something big!"
"Yeah...Hey Kel, can I offer you up as a sacrifice to keep Sky happy?"
Brook wouldn't be taking the fight if he didn't think he could win. It's keeping Brook happy.
Or it's a cash out given that he wasn't getting offered "enough" to face Vargas...
:roll: Yeah, because world champion boxers in their prime always cash out.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23138
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by mickey1975 »

Brook does better than Jr.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Fair play to Khan, he's tweeted that he's behind Brook 100% (although also put in a dig to say don't pull out :lol:)
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by lefty »

Boxerbeetle wrote:Fair play to Khan, he's tweeted that he's behind Brook 100% (although also put in a dig to say don't pull out :lol:)
:lol:
adamwillan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 03 Apr 2008, 19:04

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by adamwillan »

Only a 2 month camp, does anyone know if Kell has been in training?

Living a minute away from Brammal lane gutted this isn't local, but assuming O2 as will be some big ticket prices to cover GGG costs.
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Cyclops »

lefty wrote:
clopixolacuphase wrote:Just got a phone call off a mate to tell me this!

Holy crap. Fair play to Brook he is a big welter and can probably do MW with the right training camp. It's not like Khan, who turned over at LW, fighting Canelo. I'd expect Kell and GGG to probably weigh about the same in the ring.

Eubank jnr vs Saunders 2 on the undercard, anybody?
Not sure how the latter is gonna happen with Saunders with Fwank.
:doh: my boxing politics are very poor these days. I am just trying to enjoy the game now without all the bollocks and cynicism and have consequently become more excitable and naive. Perhaps Jnr could be on the undercard at least, calling out GGG after his latest knockover?
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by lefty »

Eubank jnr isn't happy :lol:

"I haven't been shown one contract since my fight with GGG was announced. I'm still ready & waiting to sign. Fighting Brook is a joke #2Small"
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Cyclops »

mickey1975 wrote:Brook does better than Jr.
I have to say that was my first thoughts too. He's a better boxer and the best chin is the chin that doesn't get hit, as the old cliche goes. Eubank has the size but is going to get clobbered all night. I can see Kell being more elusive.
littlepug
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5351
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 07:17

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by littlepug »

you just cant second guess this game can ya ? kells getting smashed but i hope to god the bookies overate brook so we can all make a few quid !
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Horse »

Brook should stay at welterweight.

This fight is stupid.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Andrew »

Damn still sinking in Brook better be getting some serious money for this though.

I simply can not see any other outcome than GGG winning by destruction. Seriously how can anyone give him more of a chance than Lemeiux or Conelo. I mean some actually gave Khan some chance against Conelo but this is a whole new level.

If Brook pulls this off then it''s close to Turpin v Robinson 1

Jumping from Bizier to GGG is like playing Non League football to Real Madrid.
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by stevedoc »

i wonder who the crowd will be behind obviously brook is the english fighter but Golovkin is the star coming over most will be there to see Golovkin not Brook ....50/50 i reckon
Stuffs
Welterweight
Posts: 611
Joined: 29 Jun 2016, 06:28

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Stuffs »

This is absolutely brilliant.

Might as well get the congratulations to Brook out first. He's got bollocks the size of his belly to step up this fight, however for the first time in a long time I'll gladly be screaming to Eddie "Shut up and take my money". £16.99 or whatever is a bargain to see Thepehal Kell Bwuck get sparked out.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Andrew »

Can brook bring weapons in or Margarito hand wraps ?
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Cyclops »

adamwillan wrote:Only a 2 month camp, does anyone know if Kell has been in training?

Living a minute away from Brammal lane gutted this isn't local, but assuming O2 as will be some big ticket prices to cover GGG costs.
Listening to some boxing podcasts today, can't remember if it was Bunce or Nuthouse, but in one they were saying he was looking pretty big and that he would struggle to make WW again. I'm pretty sure it was Nuthouse, actually.

They were completely mugging him off for being fat and only in it for the money.

Definitely Nuthouse.
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by magwitch »

Horse wrote:
Parson Cross wrote:Stand by all the haters become lovers.
I'll love watching Brook get smeared all over the canvas.
You don’t sound quite plumb to me, Horse. Sorry.
Post Reply