Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by lefty »

I'm gonna put money on Brook, fornicate it! See, bigdoofus I do rate Brook I was just pissed off with the matchmaking.
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Oiky »

Good fight but 100% ggg wins :box:
Finch
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1129
Joined: 01 Mar 2008, 08:14

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Finch »

Kell Brook really needs to take stock of his promoter here.

Brook clearly had the balls to fight legit fighters, but to get thrown to the wolves in fighting the best guy on the planet two weights higher is a disgrace on Hearn's part.

This just means that Eddie can't get the big fights at Welter so is sacrificing the lamb to keep Sky happy. Absolute disgrace by Eddie.

Really hope Brook gives a good account of himself but fear a bad defeat impedes his ability to get big title fights at his true weight.

Eddie Hearn hang your head in shame.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Brook is a fool to accept it. He's going to get ripped to pieces. Is he mad.

People are applauding him I think someone needs to have a quiet word in his ear and ask if he's lost his mind.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Verdi wrote:Good matchup, could be the fight of the year. Didn't expect that, can't wait! :bag: :TU:
Really? Why would it be fight of the year. It's going to be a one sided beating.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Boxerbeetle »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Brook is a fool to accept it. He's going to get ripped to pieces. Is he mad.

People are applauding him I think someone needs to have a quiet word in his ear and ask if he's lost his mind.
Maybe constant criticism of his resume has driven him insane?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Counter-puncher »

Finch wrote:Kell Brook really needs to take stock of his promoter here.

Brook clearly had the balls to fight legit fighters, but to get thrown to the wolves in fighting the best guy on the planet two weights higher is a disgrace on Hearn's part.

This just means that Eddie can't get the big fights at Welter so is sacrificing the lamb to keep Sky happy. Absolute disgrace by Eddie.

Really hope Brook gives a good account of himself but fear a bad defeat impedes his ability to get big title fights at his true weight.

Eddie Hearn hang your head in shame.
People talk about it as a cash-out fight for brook, I think Camp Eddie is the one cashing out,Brook seemingly not an 'asset' he is that keen to protect? Considering, you know, he brings no fans or name recognition or personality or US profile...?
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16933
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Nightmare Roy »

It's going to be interesting, I don't think I've seen Kell loose a round let alone a fight. He's gone one better than Kahn here and made the Eubanks look like a right pair of knobs, fair play Kell. :lol: :TU:
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Nightmare Roy wrote:It's going to be interesting, I don't think I've seen Kell loose a round let alone a fight. He's gone one better than Kahn here and made the Eubanks look like a right pair of knobs, fair play Kell. :lol: :TU:
You must have missed the first Carson Jones fight then :TU:
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Cyclops »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Finch wrote:Kell Brook really needs to take stock of his promoter here.

Brook clearly had the balls to fight legit fighters, but to get thrown to the wolves in fighting the best guy on the planet two weights higher is a disgrace on Hearn's part.

This just means that Eddie can't get the big fights at Welter so is sacrificing the lamb to keep Sky happy. Absolute disgrace by Eddie.

Really hope Brook gives a good account of himself but fear a bad defeat impedes his ability to get big title fights at his true weight.

Eddie Hearn hang your head in shame.
People talk about it as a cash-out fight for brook, I think Camp Eddie is the one cashing out,Brook seemingly not an 'asset' he is that keen to protect? Considering, you know, he brings no fans or name recognition or personality or US profile...?
Hearn is doing very nicely with Joshua at the moment and probably sees that he is going to lose Brook to another promoter anyway unless he delivers something massive for him, so why not throw him in with the best fighter in the world? Brook has said he wanted this since Khan signed for his Canelo execution, so all of a sudden in Brook's eyes camp Eddie has gone from the guy who can't deliver him fights to the guy who's delivered him the biggest possible fight out there. It trumps Khan-Canelo, maybe not in monetary terms, but certainly in kudos and in the dick waving look at the size of my fornicating bollocks stakes. GGG is THE hardest bastard in boxing (with the possible exception of Kovalev). Brook is probably sick of hearing he has no bottle: well this should shut everybody up.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Counter-puncher »

Mmmm maybe
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by crusader »

Eh, I don't really like this too much, although I don't think size will be as much of an issue as some will want to make it. Brook has fought at 154 several times before and even once at MW; he's not a former lightweight who only recently moved up to 147.

I don't think there will be a big gap between GGG and Brook's weights on the night.
Last edited by crusader on 08 Jul 2016, 15:15, edited 1 time in total.
Shirow
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1718
Joined: 29 Nov 2003, 11:15

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Shirow »

lefty wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:
lefty wrote: That's effing Canelo-esque lol
Obviously just a guess but looking at him there is no way he 'only' puts 12lbs back on, I'm positive its more than that. Leo Santa Cruz probably puts more than 12 on so I'm damn sure kell does.
Brook and Canelo would probably be a good fight actually.
As Canelo has been seemingly trying to prove that he can beat any Welterweight in the world at Caneloweight i thought the same thing. Brook is the only one i could imagine beating him.
I've no idea how he makes Welter he should be at Light Middle. It will be good to see GGG anyway and especially against a very talented boxer but this could be ugly.
Kell really should have held out for Light middleweight, this only ends one way.

GGG will take heat for this too but when you plan A (Canelo), B (Saunders), C (Jacobs) & D (Eubank) all elude you and you want to stay busy you'll take any stadium sell out PPV you can i suppose.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by samwbr »

clopixolacuphase wrote:
adamwillan wrote:Only a 2 month camp, does anyone know if Kell has been in training?

Living a minute away from Brammal lane gutted this isn't local, but assuming O2 as will be some big ticket prices to cover GGG costs.
Listening to some boxing podcasts today, can't remember if it was Bunce or Nuthouse, but in one they were saying he was looking pretty big and that he would struggle to make WW again. I'm pretty sure it was Nuthouse, actually.

They were completely mugging him off for being fat and only in it for the money.

Definitely Nuthouse.
he's looked fat for years between fights but he was different level on sky for Thurman v Porter. Could barely see over his own neck.
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by samwbr »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Nightmare Roy wrote:It's going to be interesting, I don't think I've seen Kell loose a round let alone a fight. He's gone one better than Kahn here and made the Eubanks look like a right pair of knobs, fair play Kell. :lol: :TU:
You must have missed the first Carson Jones fight then :TU:
:clap:
Terminator666
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1665
Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 10:18

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Terminator666 »

Not looking forward to this. A welterweight against the might of GGG. Brook will be kod fairly early
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by lefty »

One thing that will be interesting if nothing else is the battle of the jabs. Both have very good jabs. Golovkin's is a straight up heavy offensive Jab whereas Brook tends to like to counter jab more frequently although it's still a stiff, heavy jab. The thing that makes this fight somewhat intriguing for me is that Brook is a very big welterweight- their first head to head will be more telling I think in regards to their comparative size.
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by davie »

Say what you want, British fighters are showing some serious guts just now
I've criticised the level of competition of some British fighters as much as the next man, but massive credit had to go to Khan for getting in with Canelo.
But what Kell Brook has just signed up to is different level of testicular fortitude.
Seriously, those puppies must have swollen, I'm guessing he's carrying them around in a wheel barrow at present.
He won't need to pile on muscle, to make the weight, his balls will make up the 13lb difference.

But Kell Brooks knackers aside, that's bold!

Is it a bit of oneupmanship with Khan? You went big, I'm going bigger?
Possibly, but there is no taking away from the task he has taken on and I wish him all the very best.
I'll probably spend the next couple month doing the mental gymnastic required to convince myself that Brook has the style to give GGG a good fight, he has the tools to take him on, his speed will be key etc.

But let's be honest, he'll be getting carried out of that ring after 3 short rounds
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by BigDoofus »

samwbr wrote:
clopixolacuphase wrote:
adamwillan wrote:Only a 2 month camp, does anyone know if Kell has been in training?

Living a minute away from Brammal lane gutted this isn't local, but assuming O2 as will be some big ticket prices to cover GGG costs.
Listening to some boxing podcasts today, can't remember if it was Bunce or Nuthouse, but in one they were saying he was looking pretty big and that he would struggle to make WW again. I'm pretty sure it was Nuthouse, actually.

They were completely mugging him off for being fat and only in it for the money.

Definitely Nuthouse.
he's looked fat for years between fights but he was different level on sky for Thurman v Porter. Could barely see over his own neck.
Nonsense. Here's Brook today:

https://twitter.com/IngleGym?ref_src=tw ... r%5Eauthor
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by whiskey »

Lessons from Khan vs Canelo obviously not learned. Sky want their box office loot at all costs it would seem.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by lefty »

BigDoofus wrote:
samwbr wrote:
clopixolacuphase wrote: Listening to some boxing podcasts today, can't remember if it was Bunce or Nuthouse, but in one they were saying he was looking pretty big and that he would struggle to make WW again. I'm pretty sure it was Nuthouse, actually.

They were completely mugging him off for being fat and only in it for the money.

Definitely Nuthouse.
he's looked fat for years between fights but he was different level on sky for Thurman v Porter. Could barely see over his own neck.
Nonsense. Here's Brook today:

https://twitter.com/IngleGym?ref_src=tw ... r%5Eauthor
Just speculating but I'm guessing Brook is also just someone that when he is carrying a bit of extra weight, it tends to go on his face and around the neck. That can give off the illusion of being heavier than you are.
Pac rich man
Welterweight
Posts: 3
Joined: 08 Jul 2016, 16:12

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Pac rich man »

Hearn had brook lined up for this all along Jr. Was never gona fight GGG brooks been pushing to make 147
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by sweetscience »

Great to see Brook has a huge set of gonads

However..... If I was advising him I'd have opted to swerve this and go stateside and get with a promotor who can deliver on world stage

Eddie is very good at what he does. ... But what he does is great domestic level and lambs to slaughter
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by Stuarty »

I've made a few comments on this thread and all that has been made clear is there is a lot of hate for Brook out there! I'm a Brook fan so I've obviously missed it.

Think what you will but Kell has shown some balls here. He's taking on the most dangerous and best fighter in world boxing. Even guys at his own weight are ducking him like the plague.

I can't see a way Kell wins this fight but I think he'll have a good go and I'll be supporting him even though I'm a big GGG fan! Have to favour the home guys no matter what we think of the outcome!
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47076
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED

Post by gilgamesh »

Gotta admire Brook's balls for taking this fight, but he's gonna get his head taken off here. GGG by destruction.
Post Reply