Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
I'm gonna put money on Brook, fornicate it! See, bigdoofus I do rate Brook I was just pissed off with the matchmaking.
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Good fight but 100% ggg wins 
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Kell Brook really needs to take stock of his promoter here.
Brook clearly had the balls to fight legit fighters, but to get thrown to the wolves in fighting the best guy on the planet two weights higher is a disgrace on Hearn's part.
This just means that Eddie can't get the big fights at Welter so is sacrificing the lamb to keep Sky happy. Absolute disgrace by Eddie.
Really hope Brook gives a good account of himself but fear a bad defeat impedes his ability to get big title fights at his true weight.
Eddie Hearn hang your head in shame.
Brook clearly had the balls to fight legit fighters, but to get thrown to the wolves in fighting the best guy on the planet two weights higher is a disgrace on Hearn's part.
This just means that Eddie can't get the big fights at Welter so is sacrificing the lamb to keep Sky happy. Absolute disgrace by Eddie.
Really hope Brook gives a good account of himself but fear a bad defeat impedes his ability to get big title fights at his true weight.
Eddie Hearn hang your head in shame.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Brook is a fool to accept it. He's going to get ripped to pieces. Is he mad.
People are applauding him I think someone needs to have a quiet word in his ear and ask if he's lost his mind.
People are applauding him I think someone needs to have a quiet word in his ear and ask if he's lost his mind.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45238
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Really? Why would it be fight of the year. It's going to be a one sided beating.Verdi wrote:Good matchup, could be the fight of the year. Didn't expect that, can't wait!![]()
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Maybe constant criticism of his resume has driven him insane?jamesmcdonnell wrote:Brook is a fool to accept it. He's going to get ripped to pieces. Is he mad.
People are applauding him I think someone needs to have a quiet word in his ear and ask if he's lost his mind.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
People talk about it as a cash-out fight for brook, I think Camp Eddie is the one cashing out,Brook seemingly not an 'asset' he is that keen to protect? Considering, you know, he brings no fans or name recognition or personality or US profile...?Finch wrote:Kell Brook really needs to take stock of his promoter here.
Brook clearly had the balls to fight legit fighters, but to get thrown to the wolves in fighting the best guy on the planet two weights higher is a disgrace on Hearn's part.
This just means that Eddie can't get the big fights at Welter so is sacrificing the lamb to keep Sky happy. Absolute disgrace by Eddie.
Really hope Brook gives a good account of himself but fear a bad defeat impedes his ability to get big title fights at his true weight.
Eddie Hearn hang your head in shame.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16933
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
It's going to be interesting, I don't think I've seen Kell loose a round let alone a fight. He's gone one better than Kahn here and made the Eubanks look like a right pair of knobs, fair play Kell.

-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
You must have missed the first Carson Jones fight thenNightmare Roy wrote:It's going to be interesting, I don't think I've seen Kell loose a round let alone a fight. He's gone one better than Kahn here and made the Eubanks look like a right pair of knobs, fair play Kell.![]()
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Hearn is doing very nicely with Joshua at the moment and probably sees that he is going to lose Brook to another promoter anyway unless he delivers something massive for him, so why not throw him in with the best fighter in the world? Brook has said he wanted this since Khan signed for his Canelo execution, so all of a sudden in Brook's eyes camp Eddie has gone from the guy who can't deliver him fights to the guy who's delivered him the biggest possible fight out there. It trumps Khan-Canelo, maybe not in monetary terms, but certainly in kudos and in the dick waving look at the size of my fornicating bollocks stakes. GGG is THE hardest bastard in boxing (with the possible exception of Kovalev). Brook is probably sick of hearing he has no bottle: well this should shut everybody up.Counter-puncher wrote:People talk about it as a cash-out fight for brook, I think Camp Eddie is the one cashing out,Brook seemingly not an 'asset' he is that keen to protect? Considering, you know, he brings no fans or name recognition or personality or US profile...?Finch wrote:Kell Brook really needs to take stock of his promoter here.
Brook clearly had the balls to fight legit fighters, but to get thrown to the wolves in fighting the best guy on the planet two weights higher is a disgrace on Hearn's part.
This just means that Eddie can't get the big fights at Welter so is sacrificing the lamb to keep Sky happy. Absolute disgrace by Eddie.
Really hope Brook gives a good account of himself but fear a bad defeat impedes his ability to get big title fights at his true weight.
Eddie Hearn hang your head in shame.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Mmmm maybe
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Eh, I don't really like this too much, although I don't think size will be as much of an issue as some will want to make it. Brook has fought at 154 several times before and even once at MW; he's not a former lightweight who only recently moved up to 147.
I don't think there will be a big gap between GGG and Brook's weights on the night.
I don't think there will be a big gap between GGG and Brook's weights on the night.
Last edited by crusader on 08 Jul 2016, 15:15, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
As Canelo has been seemingly trying to prove that he can beat any Welterweight in the world at Caneloweight i thought the same thing. Brook is the only one i could imagine beating him.lefty wrote:Brook and Canelo would probably be a good fight actually.Counter-puncher wrote:Obviously just a guess but looking at him there is no way he 'only' puts 12lbs back on, I'm positive its more than that. Leo Santa Cruz probably puts more than 12 on so I'm damn sure kell does.lefty wrote: That's effing Canelo-esque lol
I've no idea how he makes Welter he should be at Light Middle. It will be good to see GGG anyway and especially against a very talented boxer but this could be ugly.
Kell really should have held out for Light middleweight, this only ends one way.
GGG will take heat for this too but when you plan A (Canelo), B (Saunders), C (Jacobs) & D (Eubank) all elude you and you want to stay busy you'll take any stadium sell out PPV you can i suppose.
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
he's looked fat for years between fights but he was different level on sky for Thurman v Porter. Could barely see over his own neck.clopixolacuphase wrote:Listening to some boxing podcasts today, can't remember if it was Bunce or Nuthouse, but in one they were saying he was looking pretty big and that he would struggle to make WW again. I'm pretty sure it was Nuthouse, actually.adamwillan wrote:Only a 2 month camp, does anyone know if Kell has been in training?
Living a minute away from Brammal lane gutted this isn't local, but assuming O2 as will be some big ticket prices to cover GGG costs.
They were completely mugging him off for being fat and only in it for the money.
Definitely Nuthouse.
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Boxerbeetle wrote:You must have missed the first Carson Jones fight thenNightmare Roy wrote:It's going to be interesting, I don't think I've seen Kell loose a round let alone a fight. He's gone one better than Kahn here and made the Eubanks look like a right pair of knobs, fair play Kell.![]()
-
Terminator666
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1665
- Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 10:18
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Not looking forward to this. A welterweight against the might of GGG. Brook will be kod fairly early
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
One thing that will be interesting if nothing else is the battle of the jabs. Both have very good jabs. Golovkin's is a straight up heavy offensive Jab whereas Brook tends to like to counter jab more frequently although it's still a stiff, heavy jab. The thing that makes this fight somewhat intriguing for me is that Brook is a very big welterweight- their first head to head will be more telling I think in regards to their comparative size.
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Say what you want, British fighters are showing some serious guts just now
I've criticised the level of competition of some British fighters as much as the next man, but massive credit had to go to Khan for getting in with Canelo.
But what Kell Brook has just signed up to is different level of testicular fortitude.
Seriously, those puppies must have swollen, I'm guessing he's carrying them around in a wheel barrow at present.
He won't need to pile on muscle, to make the weight, his balls will make up the 13lb difference.
But Kell Brooks knackers aside, that's bold!
Is it a bit of oneupmanship with Khan? You went big, I'm going bigger?
Possibly, but there is no taking away from the task he has taken on and I wish him all the very best.
I'll probably spend the next couple month doing the mental gymnastic required to convince myself that Brook has the style to give GGG a good fight, he has the tools to take him on, his speed will be key etc.
But let's be honest, he'll be getting carried out of that ring after 3 short rounds
I've criticised the level of competition of some British fighters as much as the next man, but massive credit had to go to Khan for getting in with Canelo.
But what Kell Brook has just signed up to is different level of testicular fortitude.
Seriously, those puppies must have swollen, I'm guessing he's carrying them around in a wheel barrow at present.
He won't need to pile on muscle, to make the weight, his balls will make up the 13lb difference.
But Kell Brooks knackers aside, that's bold!
Is it a bit of oneupmanship with Khan? You went big, I'm going bigger?
Possibly, but there is no taking away from the task he has taken on and I wish him all the very best.
I'll probably spend the next couple month doing the mental gymnastic required to convince myself that Brook has the style to give GGG a good fight, he has the tools to take him on, his speed will be key etc.
But let's be honest, he'll be getting carried out of that ring after 3 short rounds
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Nonsense. Here's Brook today:samwbr wrote:he's looked fat for years between fights but he was different level on sky for Thurman v Porter. Could barely see over his own neck.clopixolacuphase wrote:Listening to some boxing podcasts today, can't remember if it was Bunce or Nuthouse, but in one they were saying he was looking pretty big and that he would struggle to make WW again. I'm pretty sure it was Nuthouse, actually.adamwillan wrote:Only a 2 month camp, does anyone know if Kell has been in training?
Living a minute away from Brammal lane gutted this isn't local, but assuming O2 as will be some big ticket prices to cover GGG costs.
They were completely mugging him off for being fat and only in it for the money.
Definitely Nuthouse.
https://twitter.com/IngleGym?ref_src=tw ... r%5Eauthor
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Lessons from Khan vs Canelo obviously not learned. Sky want their box office loot at all costs it would seem.
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Just speculating but I'm guessing Brook is also just someone that when he is carrying a bit of extra weight, it tends to go on his face and around the neck. That can give off the illusion of being heavier than you are.BigDoofus wrote:Nonsense. Here's Brook today:samwbr wrote:he's looked fat for years between fights but he was different level on sky for Thurman v Porter. Could barely see over his own neck.clopixolacuphase wrote: Listening to some boxing podcasts today, can't remember if it was Bunce or Nuthouse, but in one they were saying he was looking pretty big and that he would struggle to make WW again. I'm pretty sure it was Nuthouse, actually.
They were completely mugging him off for being fat and only in it for the money.
Definitely Nuthouse.
https://twitter.com/IngleGym?ref_src=tw ... r%5Eauthor
-
Pac rich man
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 08 Jul 2016, 16:12
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Hearn had brook lined up for this all along Jr. Was never gona fight GGG brooks been pushing to make 147
-
sweetscience
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2816
- Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Great to see Brook has a huge set of gonads
However..... If I was advising him I'd have opted to swerve this and go stateside and get with a promotor who can deliver on world stage
Eddie is very good at what he does. ... But what he does is great domestic level and lambs to slaughter
However..... If I was advising him I'd have opted to swerve this and go stateside and get with a promotor who can deliver on world stage
Eddie is very good at what he does. ... But what he does is great domestic level and lambs to slaughter
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
I've made a few comments on this thread and all that has been made clear is there is a lot of hate for Brook out there! I'm a Brook fan so I've obviously missed it.
Think what you will but Kell has shown some balls here. He's taking on the most dangerous and best fighter in world boxing. Even guys at his own weight are ducking him like the plague.
I can't see a way Kell wins this fight but I think he'll have a good go and I'll be supporting him even though I'm a big GGG fan! Have to favour the home guys no matter what we think of the outcome!
Think what you will but Kell has shown some balls here. He's taking on the most dangerous and best fighter in world boxing. Even guys at his own weight are ducking him like the plague.
I can't see a way Kell wins this fight but I think he'll have a good go and I'll be supporting him even though I'm a big GGG fan! Have to favour the home guys no matter what we think of the outcome!
Re: Golovkin v Brook - CONFIRMED
Gotta admire Brook's balls for taking this fight, but he's gonna get his head taken off here. GGG by destruction.