Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Flanagan (c) vs. Petrov Winner and How?

Poll ended at 24 Jan 2017, 08:56

Terry Flanagan Stoppage
11
19%
Terry Flanagan Decision
41
69%
Draw
1
2%
Petr Petrov Decision
2
3%
Petr Petrov Stoppage
4
7%
 
Total votes: 59

Realistic
Cruiserweight
Posts: 539
Joined: 20 May 2011, 10:06

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Realistic »

Horse wrote:
Realistic wrote:TOC =
Terry O'conner

So you assumed correctly.

Again for clarity members have been banned for FAR LESS than Horses comments. The guy is a menace and need to be dealt with.
If you didn't hate me then you wouldn't care.

I was drunk and being an arse.

People have not been banned for far less.
I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32672
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Realistic wrote:
Horse wrote:
Realistic wrote:TOC =
Terry O'conner

So you assumed correctly.

Again for clarity members have been banned for FAR LESS than Horses comments. The guy is a menace and need to be dealt with.
If you didn't hate me then you wouldn't care.

I was drunk and being an arse.

People have not been banned for far less.
I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.
Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?
Realistic
Cruiserweight
Posts: 539
Joined: 20 May 2011, 10:06

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Realistic »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Realistic wrote:
Horse wrote:If you didn't hate me then you wouldn't care.

I was drunk and being an arse.

People have not been banned for far less.
I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.
Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?
Why would he; the Mods let him get away with anything. I seriously wish The Law was back on here as would not put up with his BS and disgraceful drunken comments. I will get banned for pointing this out before Horse gets banned for absolutely disgusting comments he makes in a drunker stupor :shame:
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by thepocketrocket »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Realistic wrote:
Horse wrote:If you didn't hate me then you wouldn't care.

I was drunk and being an arse.

People have not been banned for far less.
I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.
Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?
I will ask on behalf of everyone who missed these comments by Horse and can't seem to find them as they were cleaned, what did he say? Horse always says daft stuff...surely it can't have been that bad :doh:

Obviously general tone, no need for anyone to get iced for relaying them verbatim
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

thepocketrocket wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Realistic wrote: I do not hate you Horse I despise you. You are a flea on a rats back and gets away with far too much on here.
Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?
I will ask on behalf of everyone who missed these comments by Horse and can't seem to find them as they were cleaned, what did he say? Horse always says daft stuff...surely it can't have been that bad :doh:

Obviously general tone, no need for anyone to get iced for relaying them verbatim
Something along the lines of Gary Lockett being a scumbag or some such. That's what I recall anyway.
Realistic
Cruiserweight
Posts: 539
Joined: 20 May 2011, 10:06

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Realistic »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Did Horse ever apologise for his disgraceful comments?
I will ask on behalf of everyone who missed these comments by Horse and can't seem to find them as they were cleaned, what did he say? Horse always says daft stuff...surely it can't have been that bad :doh:

Obviously general tone, no need for anyone to get iced for relaying them verbatim
Something along the lines of Gary Lockett being a scumbag or some such. That's what I recall anyway.
And how GL wanting to get his Fighter Killed!!
Realistic
Cruiserweight
Posts: 539
Joined: 20 May 2011, 10:06

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Realistic »

Realistic wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:
I will ask on behalf of everyone who missed these comments by Horse and can't seem to find them as they were cleaned, what did he say? Horse always says daft stuff...surely it can't have been that bad :doh:

Obviously general tone, no need for anyone to get iced for relaying them verbatim
Something along the lines of Gary Lockett being a scumbag or some such. That's what I recall anyway.
And how GL wanting to get his Fighters Killed!!
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by thepocketrocket »

Not great...'wanting to get his fighter killed' though not sure of context, seems like a good way to bring legal action down on the forum for slander
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Horse »

thepocketrocket wrote:Not great...'wanting to get his fighter killed' though not sure of context, seems like a good way to bring legal action down on the forum for slander
I said that I didn't rate him as a fighter or trainer and suggested that he was a danger to his fighters etc multiple times.

And then insulted anyone that had a go at me for saying it.

Obviously I don't actually believe that he wants to get his fighters hurt.

I was a being a tosser and exaggerating, because I wasn't happy with him stopping the fight.
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by thepocketrocket »

Horse wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:Not great...'wanting to get his fighter killed' though not sure of context, seems like a good way to bring legal action down on the forum for slander
I said that I didn't rate him as a fighter or trainer and suggested that he was a danger to his fighters etc multiple times.

And then insulted anyone that had a go at me for saying it.

Obviously I don't actually believe that he wants to get his fighters hurt.

I was a being a tosser and exaggerating, because I wasn't happy with him stopping the fight.
That's fair...

In my job before my promotion I was a forum moderator. It is a very hard job striking the balance between discipline and not acting like Rudolf Hoess. I would often use the week long ban option for jerk like behaviour.

Just learn from it and step away from the computer when pissed. The two things don't mix.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Horse »

thepocketrocket wrote:That's fair...

In my job before my promotion I was a forum moderator. It is a very hard job striking the balance between discipline and not acting like Rudolf Hoess. I would often use the week long ban option for jerk like behaviour.

Just learn from it and step away from the computer when pissed. The two things don't mix.
It would be difficult not to post at all when drunk.

Even when I'm drunk it should be obvious when I'm being an overly obnoxious jerk though.

If I've got nothing nice to say then I should consider keeping it to myself.
magwitch
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by magwitch »

I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......

One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.

If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.
Realistic
Cruiserweight
Posts: 539
Joined: 20 May 2011, 10:06

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Realistic »

magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......

One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.

If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.
He did say it Mag and I screen shot it; I will not post it on here as I do not want to get the forum into trouble. Drunk or not his true colours shone through and YET again he is allowed to get away with it without reprisal. The longer Moderators allow his behaviour the more he will continue to do it. Even a weeks ban would show he crossed the line with a warning that any reoccurrence would be a life ban. Again I despise the man and he is a flea on a rats back.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Horse »

Realistic wrote:He did say it Mag and I screen shot it; I will not post it on here as I do not want to get the forum into trouble. Drunk or not his true colours shone through and YET again he is allowed to get away with it without reprisal. The longer Moderators allow his behaviour the more he will continue to do it. Even a weeks ban would show he crossed the line with a warning that any reoccurrence would be a life ban. Again I despise the man and he is a flea on a rats back.
:roll:
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Covfefe »

Interesting to learn Horse gets pissed. I'll add to the profile. :clap:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Horse »

TheDarkDestroyer wrote:Interesting to learn Horse gets pissed. I'll add to the profile. :clap:
I've got to watch what I say when MI5's finest is around.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Covfefe »

Image
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Horse »

TheDarkDestroyer wrote:Image
That guy looks far too classy.
Covfefe
Super Lightweight
Posts: 18318
Joined: 01 Jun 2017, 08:48

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Covfefe »

Image
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Counter-puncher »

Hahahahaha
Realistic
Cruiserweight
Posts: 539
Joined: 20 May 2011, 10:06

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by Realistic »

Horse wrote:
TheDarkDestroyer wrote:Interesting to learn Horse gets pissed. I'll add to the profile. :clap:
I've got to watch what I say when MI5's finest is around.
You should watch what you say FULL STOP especially trash like last night.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5429
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by forcefraser »

magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......

One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.

If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.
Why does everything have to be so politically correct these days? What is actually wrong with "especially a speccy Chinese one" It`s not exactly racial abuse is it? What else should you call a Chinese guy?

Or is it the reference to spectacles that bothers you?
dirk2686
Super Lightweight
Posts: 1982
Joined: 26 Sep 2016, 09:35

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by dirk2686 »

forcefraser wrote:
magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......

One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.

If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.
Why does everything have to be so politically correct these days? What is actually wrong with "especially a speccy Chinese one" It`s not exactly racial abuse is it? What else should you call a Chinese guy?

Or is it the reference to spectacles that bothers you?
It's the obvious implication that a Chinese smart arse is somehow 'worse.' A similar statement might be 'no one likes a cheat, especially a black one'
magwitch
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by magwitch »

dirk2686 wrote:
forcefraser wrote:
magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......

One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.

If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.
Why does everything have to be so politically correct these days? What is actually wrong with "especially a speccy Chinese one" It`s not exactly racial abuse is it? What else should you call a Chinese guy?

Or is it the reference to spectacles that bothers you?
It's the obvious implication that a Chinese smart arse is somehow 'worse.' A similar statement might be 'no one likes a cheat, especially a black one'
Abuse fraser? Maybe not, but it falls exactly within the definition of racial discrimination.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5429
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Round-By-Round - Terry Flanagan (c) vs. Petr Petrov - April 8th 2017

Post by forcefraser »

dirk2686 wrote:
forcefraser wrote:
magwitch wrote:I don’t think he said Lockett “wanted” to get anyone killed.
The word “spacker” does not sit well with me at all.
Some idiot on this forum who I won’t name in case I swell his ego last week asked “who likes a smartarse?” - “especially a speccy, Chinese one”......

One so called moderator decided to humour him like it was perfectly acceptable to be racist and I am as yet awaiting a response from The Law, who is seemingly otherwise engaged right now.

If discrimination against disability and race is accepted fare, then it doesn’t say a lot for this, nor any other forum.
Why does everything have to be so politically correct these days? What is actually wrong with "especially a speccy Chinese one" It`s not exactly racial abuse is it? What else should you call a Chinese guy?

Or is it the reference to spectacles that bothers you?
It's the obvious implication that a Chinese smart arse is somehow 'worse.' A similar statement might be 'no one likes a cheat, especially a black one'
I doubt Chinese people would find that comment that bad to be honest.

"No one likes a *nonce*, especially white ones from yorkshire"

It would be the reference to *nonce* that would offend me, not the white or Yorkshire reference.
Post Reply