Boxing needs more weight classes!
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Imagine how great multi-divisional champs had to be back when the divisions were:
Flyweight: 112 lbs (8 st / 50,802 Kg)
Bantamweight: 118 (8 st 6 lbs / 53,525 kg)
Featherweight: 126 (9 st / 57,153 kg)
Lightweight: 135 (9 st 9 lbs / 61,235 kg)
Welterweight: 147 (10½ st / 66,678 kg)
Middleweight: 160 (11 st 6 lbs / 72,574 kg)
Light Heavyweight: 175 (12½ st / 79,378 kg)
Heavyweight: (unlimited)
Henry Armstrong won three:
Featherweight (1937), welterweight (1938), lightweight (1938)
112 lbs - 135 lbs...imagine...
Flyweight: 112 lbs (8 st / 50,802 Kg)
Bantamweight: 118 (8 st 6 lbs / 53,525 kg)
Featherweight: 126 (9 st / 57,153 kg)
Lightweight: 135 (9 st 9 lbs / 61,235 kg)
Welterweight: 147 (10½ st / 66,678 kg)
Middleweight: 160 (11 st 6 lbs / 72,574 kg)
Light Heavyweight: 175 (12½ st / 79,378 kg)
Heavyweight: (unlimited)
Henry Armstrong won three:
Featherweight (1937), welterweight (1938), lightweight (1938)
112 lbs - 135 lbs...imagine...
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
and he had a draw in his attempt at the Middleweight title. That's 48 lbs. THAT is a multi-divisional champion!oogiebe wrote: ↑14 Mar 2018, 18:57 Imagine how great multi-divisional champs had to be back when the divisions were:
Flyweight: 112 lbs (8 st / 50,802 Kg)
Bantamweight: 118 (8 st 6 lbs / 53,525 kg)
Featherweight: 126 (9 st / 57,153 kg)
Lightweight: 135 (9 st 9 lbs / 61,235 kg)
Welterweight: 147 (10½ st / 66,678 kg)
Middleweight: 160 (11 st 6 lbs / 72,574 kg)
Light Heavyweight: 175 (12½ st / 79,378 kg)
Heavyweight: (unlimited)
Henry Armstrong won three:
Featherweight (1937), welterweight (1938), lightweight (1938)
112 lbs - 135 lbs...imagine...
-
Deleted_Scenes
- Middleweight
- Posts: 633
- Joined: 29 Oct 2013, 17:02
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Caneloweight (155), super caneloweight (164.5) and cleaneloweight (185)??
The last one sponsored by Chepo Reynoso's butcher's shop?
The last one sponsored by Chepo Reynoso's butcher's shop?
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
And the hits just keep on coming! OMG...this is the best.Deleted_Scenes wrote: ↑14 Mar 2018, 19:45 Caneloweight (155), super caneloweight (164.5) and cleaneloweight (185)??
The last one sponsored by Chepo Reynoso's butcher's shop?
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Butterbean weight 400Ibs, Light Butterbean weight 350Ibs, Super Butterbean weight over 400Ibs
Pie weight 314Ibs
Mathsweight 123Ibs
Pie weight 314Ibs
Mathsweight 123Ibs
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Whilst I appreciate the humour in your comments, I do feel that there is a genuine need for the creation of a new weight class between the 200lbs cruiserweight limit and the typical 6’ 5” 250lbs average physical bench mark of a top-tier world-class heavyweight.actjac wrote: ↑14 Mar 2018, 15:44The IBF, WBA,WBC and WBO need more championship sanctioning fees. There are only 10 weight classes in the thirty five pounds between 105 lb. Minimumweight and 140 lbs. Jr. Welterweight. . . .I am calling for more weight divisions. . . .at 102 lbs. the Ant-weight classs, At 100 lbs. the Midget-weight class and the 98 lb. Weakling-weight class.. . . .more can be added at a later time. Perhaps the Micro-weight class and the Atom-weight class.. . . .Junior divisions can also be made at every pound so that every boxer can fight for a title.
Not that I feel that height is hugely relevant, but the average heavyweight is significantly bigger (in height and weight) than their cruiserweight counterparts and I believe that the creation of a new weight class is necessary to fill the void.
Even if people disagree with me, I’m not the only person proposing this idea, since the WBC’s medical team are already researching the feasibility of this. It’s inevitable, though the new weight class may not be introduced this year or next, it’ll surely be created within the next five years or so.
I’ll wait for the predictable retort, whereby some lunatic, who hasn’t researched the heights/weights of the top sixty heavyweights, attempts to debunk my theory by listing a few notable exceptions to the general rule.
-
Deleted_Scenes
- Middleweight
- Posts: 633
- Joined: 29 Oct 2013, 17:02
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
I'd agree with that. Drop cruiserweight back to 190, set a heavyweight limit of 210 or 215, then call anything above that super heavyweight.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 05:09 Whilst I appreciate the humour in your comments, I do feel that there is a genuine need for the creation of a new weight class between the 200lbs cruiserweight limit and the typical 6’ 5” 250lbs average physical bench mark of a top-tier world-class heavyweight.
I'd balance it up at the low end though, by scrapping 105, 108, 112 and 115, and replacing them with 106, 110 and 114. That evens up the % differences in weight so they'd be roughly the same as the jumps in the bantam to super middleweight range.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
To be honest, I’ve always refrained from commenting on the differences between the weight classes of the lighter divisions, because I’m not hugely familiar with the men that compete in them or their physicality.Deleted_Scenes wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 05:21I'd agree with that. Drop cruiserweight back to 190, set a heavyweight limit of 210 or 215, then call anything above that super heavyweight.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 05:09 Whilst I appreciate the humour in your comments, I do feel that there is a genuine need for the creation of a new weight class between the 200lbs cruiserweight limit and the typical 6’ 5” 250lbs average physical bench mark of a top-tier world-class heavyweight.
I'd balance it up at the low end though, by scrapping 105, 108, 112 and 115, and replacing them with 106, 110 and 114. That evens up the % differences in weight so they'd be roughly the same as the jumps in the bantam to super middleweight range.
I don’t know if it’s commonplace for nearly all fighters that compete at 105lbs to make the jump to 108lbs. I’m sure a lot of the top dogs do, but if the vast majority of the remainder don’t, then perhaps the weight class needs to exist. I have the same thoughts for the other lighter weight divisions also.
To be fair, I honestly don’t know what it’s like to be such a small adult in the first place and attempt to drop 3lbs. A lot of us could do this by simply going to the toilet and not consuming liquid for a several hours, without feeling drained, but it’s probably proportionally much more challenging to achieve this sort of short-term weight loss if you’re a really small guy with low levels of body fat.
I also doubt that the sports’ governing bodies earn very much from the sanctioning fees, since I don’t believe that the men that compete in the lighter weight classes earn very much money in the first place (some of the world champions have to fight cab driver journeymen between title defences in order to keep paying their bills). So I have to discount “greed” as the motivation for the existence of some of the weight classes in the lower divisions. I don’t think losing a few championship belts from those divisions would affect the profit and loss accounts of the WBA, WBC, IBF & the WBO one iota.
If I was to enter the ring right now, I’d be a light heavyweight. I have zero empathy for grown men that weigh around the 105lbs mark or those slightly heavier. So it’s easy for me to say that losing or gaining three or four pounds is trivial, since I’m a giant compared to those guys.
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
How many 250Ib world level boxers are there that don't carry a lot of excess weight?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 05:09Whilst I appreciate the humour in your comments, I do feel that there is a genuine need for the creation of a new weight class between the 200lbs cruiserweight limit and the typical 6’ 5” 250lbs average physical bench mark of a top-tier world-class heavyweight.actjac wrote: ↑14 Mar 2018, 15:44The IBF, WBA,WBC and WBO need more championship sanctioning fees. There are only 10 weight classes in the thirty five pounds between 105 lb. Minimumweight and 140 lbs. Jr. Welterweight. . . .I am calling for more weight divisions. . . .at 102 lbs. the Ant-weight classs, At 100 lbs. the Midget-weight class and the 98 lb. Weakling-weight class.. . . .more can be added at a later time. Perhaps the Micro-weight class and the Atom-weight class.. . . .Junior divisions can also be made at every pound so that every boxer can fight for a title.
Not that I feel that height is hugely relevant, but the average heavyweight is significantly bigger (in height and weight) than their cruiserweight counterparts and I believe that the creation of a new weight class is necessary to fill the void.
Even if people disagree with me, I’m not the only person proposing this idea, since the WBC’s medical team are already researching the feasibility of this. It’s inevitable, though the new weight class may not be introduced this year or next, it’ll surely be created within the next five years or so.
I’ll wait for the predictable retort, whereby some lunatic, who hasn’t researched the heights/weights of the top sixty heavyweights, attempts to debunk my theory by listing a few notable exceptions to the general rule.![]()
People want to fight in the highest division.
-
Enlightened-One
- Super Lightweight
- Posts: 14618
- Joined: 19 Jul 2016, 05:12
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Boxing isn’t a bodybuilding contest and I’d argue that most heavyweights, whilst not being particularly well-defined, do not carry excessive weight… with “excessive” being the operative word.BitPlayer wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 07:47How many 250Ib world level boxers are there that don't carry a lot of excess weight?Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 05:09Whilst I appreciate the humour in your comments, I do feel that there is a genuine need for the creation of a new weight class between the 200lbs cruiserweight limit and the typical 6’ 5” 250lbs average physical bench mark of a top-tier world-class heavyweight.actjac wrote: ↑14 Mar 2018, 15:44The IBF, WBA,WBC and WBO need more championship sanctioning fees. There are only 10 weight classes in the thirty five pounds between 105 lb. Minimumweight and 140 lbs. Jr. Welterweight. . . .I am calling for more weight divisions. . . .at 102 lbs. the Ant-weight classs, At 100 lbs. the Midget-weight class and the 98 lb. Weakling-weight class.. . . .more can be added at a later time. Perhaps the Micro-weight class and the Atom-weight class.. . . .Junior divisions can also be made at every pound so that every boxer can fight for a title.
Not that I feel that height is hugely relevant, but the average heavyweight is significantly bigger (in height and weight) than their cruiserweight counterparts and I believe that the creation of a new weight class is necessary to fill the void.
Even if people disagree with me, I’m not the only person proposing this idea, since the WBC’s medical team are already researching the feasibility of this. It’s inevitable, though the new weight class may not be introduced this year or next, it’ll surely be created within the next five years or so.
I’ll wait for the predictable retort, whereby some lunatic, who hasn’t researched the heights/weights of the top sixty heavyweights, attempts to debunk my theory by listing a few notable exceptions to the general rule.![]()
People want to fight in the highest division.
Historically-speaking, barring a few obvious notable exceptions, the physiques of heavyweights from previous eras are no better than the current crop of big men.
The main difference relates to the fact that the vast majority opponents of the prime versions of legends like Mike Tyson, Larry Holmes and George Foreman were simply the modern-day equivalents of rehydrated 175lb-ers or cruiserweights (in both height and weight).
I’ve already supplied the stats to the forum, so I possess an educated opinion that was thoroughly researched.
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Humans keep getting bigger, so any new class created in the upper division will need to be added time and time again. I'm not sure what the answer is there.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 05:09Whilst I appreciate the humour in your comments, I do feel that there is a genuine need for the creation of a new weight class between the 200lbs cruiserweight limit and the typical 6’ 5” 250lbs average physical bench mark of a top-tier world-class heavyweight.actjac wrote: ↑14 Mar 2018, 15:44The IBF, WBA,WBC and WBO need more championship sanctioning fees. There are only 10 weight classes in the thirty five pounds between 105 lb. Minimumweight and 140 lbs. Jr. Welterweight. . . .I am calling for more weight divisions. . . .at 102 lbs. the Ant-weight classs, At 100 lbs. the Midget-weight class and the 98 lb. Weakling-weight class.. . . .more can be added at a later time. Perhaps the Micro-weight class and the Atom-weight class.. . . .Junior divisions can also be made at every pound so that every boxer can fight for a title.
Not that I feel that height is hugely relevant, but the average heavyweight is significantly bigger (in height and weight) than their cruiserweight counterparts and I believe that the creation of a new weight class is necessary to fill the void.
Even if people disagree with me, I’m not the only person proposing this idea, since the WBC’s medical team are already researching the feasibility of this. It’s inevitable, though the new weight class may not be introduced this year or next, it’ll surely be created within the next five years or so.
I’ll wait for the predictable retort, whereby some lunatic, who hasn’t researched the heights/weights of the top sixty heavyweights, attempts to debunk my theory by listing a few notable exceptions to the general rule.![]()
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
That's why we need less divisions, otherwise even an absolute idiot can get a title. There are piles of world champions I've never heard about already, let alone when there are even more divisions.oogiebe wrote: ↑14 Mar 2018, 18:59and he had a draw in his attempt at the Middleweight title. That's 48 lbs. THAT is a multi-divisional champion!oogiebe wrote: ↑14 Mar 2018, 18:57 Imagine how great multi-divisional champs had to be back when the divisions were:
Flyweight: 112 lbs (8 st / 50,802 Kg)
Bantamweight: 118 (8 st 6 lbs / 53,525 kg)
Featherweight: 126 (9 st / 57,153 kg)
Lightweight: 135 (9 st 9 lbs / 61,235 kg)
Welterweight: 147 (10½ st / 66,678 kg)
Middleweight: 160 (11 st 6 lbs / 72,574 kg)
Light Heavyweight: 175 (12½ st / 79,378 kg)
Heavyweight: (unlimited)
Henry Armstrong won three:
Featherweight (1937), welterweight (1938), lightweight (1938)
112 lbs - 135 lbs...imagine...
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Agreed. For the sake of money, they kill the sweet science. "Even an absolute idiot can get a title" or multiple. I don't think 3 - 6 pounds makes someone special above Lightweight.asdfjkl wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 15:07That's why we need less divisions, otherwise even an absolute idiot can get a title. There are piles of world champions I've never heard about already, let alone when there are even more divisions.oogiebe wrote: ↑14 Mar 2018, 18:59and he had a draw in his attempt at the Middleweight title. That's 48 lbs. THAT is a multi-divisional champion!oogiebe wrote: ↑14 Mar 2018, 18:57 Imagine how great multi-divisional champs had to be back when the divisions were:
Flyweight: 112 lbs (8 st / 50,802 Kg)
Bantamweight: 118 (8 st 6 lbs / 53,525 kg)
Featherweight: 126 (9 st / 57,153 kg)
Lightweight: 135 (9 st 9 lbs / 61,235 kg)
Welterweight: 147 (10½ st / 66,678 kg)
Middleweight: 160 (11 st 6 lbs / 72,574 kg)
Light Heavyweight: 175 (12½ st / 79,378 kg)
Heavyweight: (unlimited)
Henry Armstrong won three:
Featherweight (1937), welterweight (1938), lightweight (1938)
112 lbs - 135 lbs...imagine...
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 15:10Agreed. For the sake of money, they kill the sweet science. "Even an absolute idiot can get a title" or multiple. I don't think 3 - 6 pounds makes someone special above Lightweight.
Are you the same guy?
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Yes,,,and I was referring to the thread. I think the poster meant this to be sarcastic. Why do you ask?asdfjkl wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 15:13Are you the same guy?
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Oh lol, I didn't even read his post, I just saw the title and thought oh no no this again and made a post, not even reading his post at all. Oke, maybe I should have done lol.
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
No worries. That's why I posted response to your post. It looked like you thought it was serious!!! LOL! Be well my friend!
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Less classes, less ABCs and certainly no super or diamond champions.
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
One champion - one division.
Optimum - 12 divisions, maximum - 14 divisions.
I would like to see these changes : SMW - 172, LHW - 185, CW - 210, HW + 210.
Optimum - 12 divisions, maximum - 14 divisions.
I would like to see these changes : SMW - 172, LHW - 185, CW - 210, HW + 210.
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Unfortunately for us...it'll never happen without every boxing fan participating in some organized action.
All the alphabet orgs make so much money on fees and promotions. Who's going to give up their seat? (frankly I wish they all would). This also impacts getting the best fights, or demanded fights. When it becomes a business, it sucks.
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Unfortunately for us - I agree with you. Boxing is already half-dead sport.oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 15:33Unfortunately for us...it'll never happen without every boxing fan participating in some organized action.
All the alphabet orgs make so much money on fees and promotions. Who's going to give up their seat? (frankly I wish they all would). This also impacts getting the best fights, or demanded fights. When it becomes a business, it sucks.
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
It is so very sad. Crappy fights; good fights made too late; he can't fight him because they are both under the same promotional group; WBO/WBC/WBA/IBF, etc. not ranking the other orgs' champions, thus NEVER being mandatory. But we keep paying for it. The fighters have no say...I guess some don't want any.ValMar wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 15:36Unfortunately for us - I agree with you. Boxing is already half-dead sport.oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 15:33Unfortunately for us...it'll never happen without every boxing fan participating in some organized action.
All the alphabet orgs make so much money on fees and promotions. Who's going to give up their seat? (frankly I wish they all would). This also impacts getting the best fights, or demanded fights. When it becomes a business, it sucks.
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Yes.......oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 15:39It is so very sad. Crappy fights; good fights made too late; he can't fight him because they are both under the same promotional group; WBO/WBC/WBA/IBF, etc. not ranking the other orgs' champions, thus NEVER being mandatory. But we keep paying for it. The fighters have no say...I guess some don't want any.ValMar wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 15:36Unfortunately for us - I agree with you. Boxing is already half-dead sport.oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 15:33
Unfortunately for us...it'll never happen without every boxing fan participating in some organized action.
All the alphabet orgs make so much money on fees and promotions. Who's going to give up their seat? (frankly I wish they all would). This also impacts getting the best fights, or demanded fights. When it becomes a business, it sucks.
Re: Boxing needs more weight classes!
Sheesh! I think I'd rather debate AJ v. Wilder, much as I've had it up to here with that one.ValMar wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 16:19Yes.......oogiebe wrote: ↑15 Mar 2018, 15:39It is so very sad. Crappy fights; good fights made too late; he can't fight him because they are both under the same promotional group; WBO/WBC/WBA/IBF, etc. not ranking the other orgs' champions, thus NEVER being mandatory. But we keep paying for it. The fighters have no say...I guess some don't want any.![]()