The stars are correct, when I look into it. Last change for both bouts where from August 31???MontyCircus wrote: ↑21 Sep 2020, 21:51 Both Charlo fights on the PPV this Saturday are showing up on the schedule and on the bout page and on each fighters' pages as "no-star" fights.
Jermall Charlo vs. Sergiy Derevyanchenko
Jermell Charlo vs. Jeison Rosario
They were showing correctly maybe yesterday or the day before, but not at the moment.
Ratings - please read before commenting - Archived
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
I updated the Boxrec annual ratings (now including 2019) with the latest Whole-History ratings.
- female Atomweight will be added
- p4p will be added
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Great jobcomputerrank wrote: ↑25 Sep 2020, 09:38I updated the Boxrec annual ratings (now including 2019) with the latest Whole-History ratings.
- female Atomweight will be added
- p4p will be added
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Some questions about the 2019 154lb rankings...computerrank wrote: ↑25 Sep 2020, 09:38I updated the Boxrec annual ratings (now including 2019) with the latest Whole-History ratings.
- female Atomweight will be added
- p4p will be added
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxR ... ht_Annuals
Why are the 2019 ratings so much lower than what's actually on their individual pages?
and shouldn't Patrick Texiera be on here for 2019? https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/508315
speaking of him, why is his boxrec page rating (38.77) different than his current 154 rating (51.85)? Hurd as well...
https://boxrec.com/en/ratings?role=prob ... ddleweight
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Manrae wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 03:52Some questions about the 2019 154lb rankings...computerrank wrote: ↑25 Sep 2020, 09:38I updated the Boxrec annual ratings (now including 2019) with the latest Whole-History ratings.
- female Atomweight will be added
- p4p will be added
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxR ... ht_Annuals
Why are the 2019 ratings so much lower than what's actually on their individual pages?
and shouldn't Patrick Texiera be on here for 2019? https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/508315
speaking of him, why is his boxrec page rating (38.77) different than his current 154 rating (51.85)? Hurd as well...
https://boxrec.com/en/ratings?role=prob ... ddleweight
Re: WHR ratings
Hello! Is there a possible way you could send me the info on this old rankings? If it's too long, maybe a cutoff of 500. Even a temporarily put up link please!
2nd question, are the following algorithm rules still in effect?
- UD, PTS, DQ, TD are rewarded with full value v=1 for 12 rounds boxed and more and a lower value related to the number of rounds boxed, clear decision factor cd=1. If the score cards are available, it may be less.
MD, SD are rewarded with full value v=1 for 12 rounds boxed and more and a lower value related to the number of rounds boxed. Clear decision factor is limited to cd=0.5. If the score cards are available cd may be less.
DRAW is rewarded with full value v=1 for 12 rounds boxed and more and a lower value related to the number of rounds boxed. Clear decision factor cd=0.
If the score cards are available, the value rewarded is in direct proportion to the rounds boxed, with full value v=1 for 12 rounds boxed and more. The clear decision factor is in proportion to rounds boxed and the mean score difference per judge. cd=1 for a mean score difference per judge of 50% of the rounds boxed.
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
So far, my predictions are missing. 95% + battles gives fighters a point reduction.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: WHR ratings
What version do you mean with old rankings, please? And yes, v value is still valid in WHR ratings.Daedalus wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 13:29Hello! Is there a possible way you could send me the info on this old rankings? If it's too long, maybe a cutoff of 500. Even a temporarily put up link please!
2nd question, are the following algorithm rules still in effect?
- UD, PTS, DQ, TD are rewarded with full value v=1 for 12 rounds boxed and more and a lower value related to the number of rounds boxed, clear decision factor cd=1. If the score cards are available, it may be less.
MD, SD are rewarded with full value v=1 for 12 rounds boxed and more and a lower value related to the number of rounds boxed. Clear decision factor is limited to cd=0.5. If the score cards are available cd may be less.
DRAW is rewarded with full value v=1 for 12 rounds boxed and more and a lower value related to the number of rounds boxed. Clear decision factor cd=0.
If the score cards are available, the value rewarded is in direct proportion to the rounds boxed, with full value v=1 for 12 rounds boxed and more. The clear decision factor is in proportion to rounds boxed and the mean score difference per judge. cd=1 for a mean score difference per judge of 50% of the rounds boxed.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Whole-History Ratings - P4P current ratings
Something like what you did below, but for all-time.computerrank wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 15:22What version do you mean with old rankings, please? And yes, v value is still valid in WHR ratings.
computerrank wrote: ↑04 Oct 2019, 12:19Code: Select all
1 1 Middleweight 348759 Saul Alvarez MX 1637 1651 ** 2 4 Welterweight 447121 Terence Crawford US 1489 1134 3 2 Middleweight 356831 Gennady Golovkin KZ 1422 1254 4 3 Lightweight 659771 Vasiliy Lomachenko UA 1301 1163 5 6 Welterweight 629465 Errol Spence Jr US 1249 992.2 ** 6 16 Cruiserweight 659772 Oleksandr Usyk UA 972.9 495.8 7 13 Super Featherweight 553222 Miguel Berchelt MX 917.3 520.6 ** 8 26 Super Middleweight 631178 Callum Smith UK 890.2 367.2 9 7 Featherweight 374624 Leo Santa Cruz MX 861.0 586.2 * 10 5 Welterweight 6129 Manny Pacquiao PH 837.5 1025 11 8 Light Heavyweight 505927 Sergey Kovalev RU 805.4 571.2 12 14 Welterweight 472133 Shawn Porter US 780.4 516.0 ** 13 109 Heavyweight 489762 Andy Ruiz Jr US 754.9 121.0 14 17 Middleweight 432984 Daniel Jacobs US 709.9 477.1 15 21 Welterweight 429442 Danny Garcia US 671.7 392.0 ** 16 62 Light Heavyweight 679709 Oleksandr Gvozdyk UA 660.8 203.5 ** 17 34 Middleweight 471634 Jermall Charlo US 657.3 300.3 ** 18 47 Light Heavyweight 703924 Dmitry Bivol RU 625.9 250.3 19 37 Heavyweight 468841 Deontay Wilder US 622.3 291.3 ** 20 43 Super Middleweight 588468 Chris Eubank Jr UK 612.9 258.8 21 20 Featherweight 479775 Gary Allen Russell Jr US 609.9 413.8 22 29 Super Featherweight 643387 Gervonta Davis US 604.3 332.8 23 44 Heavyweight 659461 Anthony Joshua UK 604.0 256.7 24 15 Featherweight 512777 Josh Warrington UK 600.5 503.4 25 25 Super Flyweight 467843 Juan Francisco Estrada MX 599.3 368.8 26 28 Welterweight 541777 Yordenis Ugas CU 599.0 336.4 27 46 Cruiserweight 514537 Mairis Briedis LV 587.4 251.0 28 27 Light Welterweight 632104 Jose Carlos Ramirez US 578.8 362.0 29 32 Light Welterweight 611370 Regis Prograis US 559.5 313.5 30 33 Light Welterweight 725709 Josh Taylor UK 555.4 301.8 31 55 Heavyweight 479205 Tyson Fury UK 549.5 218.7 32 57 Light Middleweight 659924 Jaime Munguia MX 546.7 217.7 33 24 Super Bantamweight 602423 Emanuel Navarrete MX 544.0 372.7 * 34 9 Bantamweight 628407 Naoya Inoue JP 535.6 564.8 * 35 11 Welterweight 426053 Keith Thurman US 519.9 538.0 36 56 Lightweight 563751 Richard Commey GH 509.2 218.4 ** 37 129 Super Featherweight 740705 Shavkatdzhon Rakhimov RU 506.5 107.9 38 30 Super Flyweight 528191 Wisaksil Wangek TH 501.4 322.2 * 39 12 Featherweight 499601 Carl Frampton UK 488.0 530.1 40 22 Super Bantamweight 542148 Rey Vargas MX 487.0 377.6 ** 41 83 Heavyweight 318081 Alexander Povetkin RU 483.2 150.7 42 35 Light Middleweight 457231 Erislandy Lara US 482.5 294.7 43 79 Light Middleweight 536011 Julian Williams US 481.9 155.4 44 36 Middleweight 468433 Demetrius Andrade US 469.7 293.9 * 45 10 Welterweight 364679 Mikey Garcia US 464.2 555.1 46 61 Super Featherweight 367450 Andrew Cancio US 462.9 203.5 47 40 Light Heavyweight 503963 Eleider Alvarez CO 461.1 281.1 * 48 18 Bantamweight 611983 Luis Nery MX 443.3 458.7 49 42 Light Heavyweight 509666 Gilberto Ramirez MX 425.4 260.7 ** 50 130 Heavyweight 569964 Dillian Whyte UK 421.6 106.6 ** 51 148 Welterweight 499476 David Avanesyan RU 416.0 96.00 52 76 Light Middleweight 625960 Jarrett Hurd US 412.6 158.0 53 58 Super Bantamweight 549073 Daniel Roman US 403.9 213.3 54 41 Light Flyweight 692967 Ken Shiro JP 403.2 275.9 55 39 Bantamweight 48243 Nonito Donaire PH 390.0 284.1 ** 56 245 Middleweight 556657 Michael Zerafa AU 381.0 59.41 57 49 Welterweight 314558 Amir Khan UK 379.7 238.8 * 58 19 Featherweight 629933 Oscar Valdez MX 374.3 420.2 59 63 Lightweight 776269 Teofimo Lopez US 373.1 189.6 ** 60 214 Welterweight 738032 Kudratillo Abdukakhorov UZ 370.4 67.87 61 74 Welterweight 684792 Sergey Lipinets RU 369.9 159.7 ** 62 260 Heavyweight 498837 Jarrell Miller US 367.3 56.80 63 60 Light Middleweight 468475 Jessie Vargas US 366.8 205.9 ** 64 128 Middleweight 657422 Ryota Murata JP 364.5 108.7 ** 65 183 Heavyweight 528949 Luis Ortiz CU 363.6 78.92 66 77 Light Heavyweight 610132 Jesse Hart US 360.7 157.2 ** 67 137 Light Middleweight 574588 Tony Harrison US 359.7 99.98 68 122 Light Heavyweight 290691 Jean Pascal CA 358.8 111.3 69 45 Lightweight 459640 Lee Selby UK 356.4 256.4 70 125 Light Middleweight 625137 Brian Carlos Castano AR 353.7 110.5 71 71 Light Welterweight 432621 Viktor Postol UA 351.4 162.2 72 133 Light Heavyweight 497268 Badou Jack SE 347.8 102.9 73 68 Lightweight 651514 Luke Campbell UK 345.0 164.8 74 51 Light Welterweight 523667 Jose Zepeda US 343.4 230.8 75 59 Bantamweight 359270 Zolani Tete ZA 343.1 212.4 * 76 23 Super Flyweight 483786 Kazuto Ioka JP 342.5 377.4 77 90 Light Heavyweight 629463 Marcus Browne US 342.3 143.9 ** 78 197 Heavyweight 511850 Kubrat Pulev BG 339.4 73.55 79 81 Lightweight 741718 Devin Haney US 333.3 152.7 80 89 Middleweight 691996 Sergiy Derevyanchenko UA 332.4 144.8 81 98 Lightweight 371746 Anthony Crolla UK 331.3 134.0 * 82 38 Light Middleweight 272717 Kell Brook UK 330.4 284.3 83 54 Super Featherweight 562946 Tevin Farmer US 327.9 219.6 84 82 Super Featherweight 140100 Miguel Roman MX 322.2 151.6 85 52 Light Middleweight 433135 Jermell Charlo US 318.8 226.1 86 70 Super Middleweight 482499 Billy Joe Saunders UK 315.6 163.3 87 99 Featherweight 665698 Can Xu CN 312.9 132.3 88 147 Light Middleweight 723287 Carlos Adames DO 312.4 96.13 89 75 Welterweight 455859 Adrien Broner US 312.3 159.0 ** 90 180 Super Middleweight 545557 John Ryder UK 309.1 79.87 91 53 Flyweight 666339 Kosei Tanaka JP 304.7 223.3 92 48 Super Bantamweight 492989 Guillermo Rigondeaux CU 304.0 247.4 ** 93 255 Light Welterweight 352193 Pablo Cesar Cano MX 303.4 57.28 94 117 Light Welterweight 570403 Maurice Hooker US 300.9 114.1 * 95 31 Super Flyweight 215599 Donnie Nietes PH 294.1 321.5 96 86 Light Middleweight 466535 Liam Smith UK 292.3 148.1 ** 97 195 Super Middleweight 546589 Rocky Fielding UK 291.1 74.11 98 73 Minimumweight 383177 Chayaphon Moonsri TH 288.5 159.8 99 119 Middleweight 635000 Jeff Horn AU 287.6 112.2 100 64 Super Flyweight 613018 Khalid Yafai UK 286.5 186.4
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Whole-History Ratings - P4P current ratings
Why don't you use the all time ratings from the public pages?Daedalus wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 17:23Something like what you did below, but for all-time.computerrank wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 15:22What version do you mean with old rankings, please? And yes, v value is still valid in WHR ratings.computerrank wrote: ↑04 Oct 2019, 12:19Code: Select all
1 1 Middleweight 348759 Saul Alvarez MX 1637 1651 ** 2 4 Welterweight 447121 Terence Crawford US 1489 1134 3 2 Middleweight 356831 Gennady Golovkin KZ 1422 1254
Re: Whole-History Ratings - P4P current ratings
I did. I just want to see where high ranking ATG's who I remember were on the old list, such as Jack Johnson and Sam Langford who made top 50, but now out of the top 1000.computerrank wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 17:40Why don't you use the all time ratings from the public pages?Daedalus wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 17:23Something like what you did below, but for all-time.computerrank wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 15:22 What version do you mean with old rankings, please? And yes, v value is still valid in WHR ratings.computerrank wrote: ↑04 Oct 2019, 12:19Code: Select all
1 1 Middleweight 348759 Saul Alvarez MX 1637 1651 ** 2 4 Welterweight 447121 Terence Crawford US 1489 1134 3 2 Middleweight 356831 Gennady Golovkin KZ 1422 1254
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
edit: double post
Last edited by Manrae on 27 Sep 2020, 20:30, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
CoolManrae wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 20:28computerrank wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 06:46Manrae wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 03:52
Some questions about the 2019 154lb rankings...
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxR ... ht_Annuals
Why are the 2019 ratings so much lower than what's actually on their individual pages?
and shouldn't Patrick Texiera be on here for 2019? https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/508315
speaking of him, why is his boxrec page rating (38.77) different than his current 154 rating (51.85)? Hurd as well...
https://boxrec.com/en/ratings?role=prob ... ddleweightNow the annuals use the boxers' last annual bout at each division.
But what about current ratings? Why are the ratings of Patrick Texiera(38.77) and Jarret Hurd(70.27) on their individual page so much different than what's on the 154lb rankings page? (51.85 & 46.54 respectively)
edit: In fact, this is also the case for: Julian Williams, Jeff Horn, Jeison Rosario, Carlos Adames, Humberto Soto...
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Manrae wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 20:30Manrae wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 20:28Ratings are affected when their opponents fight again, so even if Texiera & Williams retired at the end of 2019, their ratings changed because Gallimore and other previous opponents fought in 2020. Same with Hurd (Welborn), Horn (Mueller), Rosario (Cota), Adames (Arriaza) and Soto (Vargas). Think of it as strength of schedule taking into account not only opponents' records, but also records of opponents' opponents.computerrank wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 06:46 But what about current ratings? Why are the ratings of Patrick Texiera(38.77) and Jarret Hurd(70.27) on their individual page so much different than what's on the 154lb rankings page? (51.85 & 46.54 respectively)
edit: In fact, this is also the case for: Julian Williams, Jeff Horn, Jeison Rosario, Carlos Adames, Humberto Soto...
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Computerrank... for the annual ratings
Why is Phillip Ndou rated at 140 instead of 135 for 2003?
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxR ... ht_Annuals
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxR ... ht_Annuals
https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/14997
Why is Phillip Ndou rated at 140 instead of 135 for 2003?
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxR ... ht_Annuals
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxR ... ht_Annuals
https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/14997
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
So the ratings for a fighter's most recent bout on their individual page is incorrect?Daedalus wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 21:17
Ratings are affected when their opponents fight again, so even if Texiera & Williams retired at the end of 2019, their ratings changed because Gallimore and other previous opponents fought in 2020. Same with Hurd (Welborn), Horn (Mueller), Rosario (Cota), Adames (Arriaza) and Soto (Vargas). Think of it as strength of schedule taking into account not only opponents' records, but also records of opponents' opponents.
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
Huh? No, the top most recent rating on the individual page is after their last fight. You do realize other fights happened after that. The division ratings list each boxer's current ratings for the day.Manrae wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 22:41So the ratings for a fighter's most recent bout on their individual page is incorrect?Daedalus wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 21:17
Ratings are affected when their opponents fight again, so even if Texiera & Williams retired at the end of 2019, their ratings changed because Gallimore and other previous opponents fought in 2020. Same with Hurd (Welborn), Horn (Mueller), Rosario (Cota), Adames (Arriaza) and Soto (Vargas). Think of it as strength of schedule taking into account not only opponents' records, but also records of opponents' opponents.
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
I have to say, even I'm a bit confused by what is displayed in the rankings versus fighter pages... the movement, etc. And I have my own rating system for MMA, so that says a lot.
For instance, I saw Casimero drop from #2 to #5 this weekend after a KO win. Was he somehow spotted some points, but then reduced after fighting a much lesser rated opponent? Did he just happen to get another penalty on the same date? I don't know.
Why do almost all boxer's current ratings seem far lower than in previous fights? Has Covid reduced activity to the point where it affects the entire landscape? Is WHR so dependent on "future" results that this is somehow treated as missing data.. and therefore, missing points? Is this a glitch in how past points are displayed?
It must be a major headache to go over the same set of questions week after week... but the WHR-based implementation is enough for folks to get a handle on, let alone all of the ancillary things. To understand WHR from a basic standpoint requires some brain power. To understand the intricacies of it, involves knowledge of some pretty advanced math... and then on top of it, all the BoxRec-specific mods. Yikes.
People would be much better off looking at the ranking pages... rather than to try and build fight-by-fight cases for fighters.
For instance, I saw Casimero drop from #2 to #5 this weekend after a KO win. Was he somehow spotted some points, but then reduced after fighting a much lesser rated opponent? Did he just happen to get another penalty on the same date? I don't know.
Why do almost all boxer's current ratings seem far lower than in previous fights? Has Covid reduced activity to the point where it affects the entire landscape? Is WHR so dependent on "future" results that this is somehow treated as missing data.. and therefore, missing points? Is this a glitch in how past points are displayed?
It must be a major headache to go over the same set of questions week after week... but the WHR-based implementation is enough for folks to get a handle on, let alone all of the ancillary things. To understand WHR from a basic standpoint requires some brain power. To understand the intricacies of it, involves knowledge of some pretty advanced math... and then on top of it, all the BoxRec-specific mods. Yikes.
People would be much better off looking at the ranking pages... rather than to try and build fight-by-fight cases for fighters.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
JCS wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 12:51 I have to say, even I'm a bit confused by what is displayed in the rankings versus fighter pages... the movement, etc. And I have my own rating system for MMA, so that says a lot.![]()
For instance, I saw Casimero drop from #2 to #5 this weekend after a KO win. Was he somehow spotted some points, but then reduced after fighting a much lesser rated opponent? Did he just happen to get another penalty on the same date? I don't know.
Why do almost all boxer's current ratings seem far lower than in previous fights? Has Covid reduced activity to the point where it affects the entire landscape? Is WHR so dependent on "future" results that this is somehow treated as missing data.. and therefore, missing points? Is this a glitch in how past points are displayed?
It must be a major headache to go over the same set of questions week after week... but the WHR-based implementation is enough for folks to get a handle on, let alone all of the ancillary things. To understand WHR from a basic standpoint requires some brain power. To understand the intricacies of it, involves knowledge of some pretty advanced math... and then on top of it, all the BoxRec-specific mods. Yikes.
People would be much better off looking at the ranking pages... rather than to try and build fight-by-fight cases for fighters.
All depends on all ... time and opponents ...
The last Boxrec bout ratings and the Boxrec current ratings are tentatively lower than the the bout ratings before, even for a boxer at his best. This is due to the fact, that the current rating is combined with more uncertainty (due to missing affirmative future results) than former results, Boxrec for this reason does not use the full WHR rating, but it uses the full WHR rating deminished by the estimated mean uncertainty.
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
???Manrae wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 22:37 Computerrank... for the annual ratings
Why is Phillip Ndou rated at 140 instead of 135 for 2003?
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxR ... ht_Annuals
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxR ... ht_Annuals
https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/14997
Re: Whole-History Ratings - P4P current ratings
computerrank wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 17:40Daedalus wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 17:23So was that page's results similar to the current algorithm? I was hoping it would be using the formula for the well-publicized list from August last year, which had Mayweather, Pacquiao, Monzon as 1-2-3. If so, I would still like a copy pls.computerrank wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 15:22 Why don't you use the all time ratings from the public pages?
A couple of months back, I did save the public all-time list. The top 3 were Charles, Moore, Robinson. Since then, points/rankings have moved:
Charles -120
Moore -80 Now #3
Robinson -80 Now #4
Mayweather +360. Moved from #4 to #2
Pacquiao +230. Moved from #10 to #5
Ironically, at this rate, May-Pac will end up 1-2 again sometime next year, even without fighting.
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Ratings - please read before commenting
I now changed the selection to last annual bout division, e.g. Lightweight for Ndou in 2003 (before selection was division with highest last annual bout, e.g. Light Welterweight for Ndou in 2003).Manrae wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 21:02???Manrae wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 22:37 Computerrank... for the annual ratings
Why is Phillip Ndou rated at 140 instead of 135 for 2003?
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxR ... ht_Annuals
https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/BoxR ... ht_Annuals
https://boxrec.com/en/proboxer/14997
-
computerrank
- Editor

- Posts: 2492
- Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59
Re: Whole-History Ratings - P4P current ratings
Daedalus wrote: ↑28 Sep 2020, 21:43computerrank wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 17:40Since August last year the database structure changed and the is no public access to the test server any longer for security reasons. So there is no chance to provide an all-time-ratings procedure with the former release.Daedalus wrote: ↑27 Sep 2020, 17:23
So was that page's results similar to the current algorithm? I was hoping it would be using the formula for the well-publicized list from August last year, which had Mayweather, Pacquiao, Monzon as 1-2-3. If so, I would still like a copy pls.
A couple of months back, I did save the public all-time list. The top 3 were Charles, Moore, Robinson. Since then, points/rankings have moved:
Charles -120
Moore -80 Now #3
Robinson -80 Now #4
Mayweather +360. Moved from #4 to #2
Pacquiao +230. Moved from #10 to #5
Ironically, at this rate, May-Pac will end up 1-2 again sometime next year, even without fighting.
