Tucker had a great chin. Yes Tyrell Biggs made it the 7th round. Tyson stopped a lot of guys earlier than that though. Of course, there is a chance that Usyk would make it that far. The odds are he would not have.Cojimar 1946 wrote: ↑25 Sep 2024, 06:47 Tyrell Biggs made it 7 and Tucker went the full 12 but Usyk cant make it four. People must have a low view of Usyk
Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
-
Ambling Alp II
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 15310
- Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
-
Klee Gluckman
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 171
- Joined: 08 Sep 2007, 10:23
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
The funny thing is that if this fight was in 1988 no one would back Usyk no one.
There is a lot of revisionism with Tyson,.
Tyson is 1988 would beat Usyk I think the trifecta was impressive
There is a lot of revisionism with Tyson,.
Tyson is 1988 would beat Usyk I think the trifecta was impressive
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
I'd take Mike by KO in the 8th or so.
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
Tyson vs Usyk is interesting because both have such different strengths. The late-80s Tyson is the toughest version for Usyk - fast head movement, quick feet, and real pressure. Usyk could outbox the 1991 and 95-96 versions over the distance, but the prime Tyson is a much harder matchup.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15824
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15824
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
The 3 factors why Mike Tyson lost his fights
1. The fighter wasn't afraid (Buster Douglas, Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis for example, were not afraid of him)
2. The boxers were bigger and stronger (Douglas, Holyfield and Lewis all over again)
3. The boxers got good boxing skills (there we go again with Douglas, Holy and Lewis)
That means Muhammad Ali, Larry Holmes and George Foreman would have beaten Tyson, too. Those 3 got the attributes to beat Tyson.
1. The fighter wasn't afraid (Buster Douglas, Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis for example, were not afraid of him)
2. The boxers were bigger and stronger (Douglas, Holyfield and Lewis all over again)
3. The boxers got good boxing skills (there we go again with Douglas, Holy and Lewis)
That means Muhammad Ali, Larry Holmes and George Foreman would have beaten Tyson, too. Those 3 got the attributes to beat Tyson.
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
Would you include Usyk in this list?elmersalsa wrote: ↑21 Nov 2025, 13:26 The 3 factors why Mike Tyson lost his fights
1. The fighter wasn't afraid (Buster Douglas, Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis for example, were not afraid of him)
2. The boxers were bigger and stronger (Douglas, Holyfield and Lewis all over again)
3. The boxers got good boxing skills (there we go again with Douglas, Holy and Lewis)
That means Muhammad Ali, Larry Holmes and George Foreman would have beaten Tyson, too. Those 3 got the attributes to beat Tyson.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15824
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
I don't think that he would be stronger than Tyson.2128778 wrote: ↑21 Nov 2025, 13:37Would you include Usyk in this list?elmersalsa wrote: ↑21 Nov 2025, 13:26 The 3 factors why Mike Tyson lost his fights
1. The fighter wasn't afraid (Buster Douglas, Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis for example, were not afraid of him)
2. The boxers were bigger and stronger (Douglas, Holyfield and Lewis all over again)
3. The boxers got good boxing skills (there we go again with Douglas, Holy and Lewis)
That means Muhammad Ali, Larry Holmes and George Foreman would have beaten Tyson, too. Those 3 got the attributes to beat Tyson.
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
Yeah that's Usyk's biggest problem here. He definitely has the skill, but the gap in strength and punching power would be pretty significant.elmersalsa wrote: ↑21 Nov 2025, 13:40I don't think that he would be stronger than Tyson.2128778 wrote: ↑21 Nov 2025, 13:37Would you include Usyk in this list?elmersalsa wrote: ↑21 Nov 2025, 13:26 The 3 factors why Mike Tyson lost his fights
1. The fighter wasn't afraid (Buster Douglas, Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis for example, were not afraid of him)
2. The boxers were bigger and stronger (Douglas, Holyfield and Lewis all over again)
3. The boxers got good boxing skills (there we go again with Douglas, Holy and Lewis)
That means Muhammad Ali, Larry Holmes and George Foreman would have beaten Tyson, too. Those 3 got the attributes to beat Tyson.
Tyson was also faster.
-
The Docker
- Bantamweight
- Posts: 618
- Joined: 16 Feb 2022, 15:26
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
People overlook the original iteration of Mike.
He would have had complete disregard for Usyk and walked straight through him.
Not even sure he'd need to duck and weave his speed, power and self belief had that much conviction.
The later iteration would have been confused to f*ck where any outcome is likely.
He would have had complete disregard for Usyk and walked straight through him.
Not even sure he'd need to duck and weave his speed, power and self belief had that much conviction.
The later iteration would have been confused to f*ck where any outcome is likely.
-
Cojimar 1946
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: 01 Mar 2015, 05:00
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
Usyk ko 10
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
I kind of go with the consensus. Tyson pre-Douglas beats Usyk, maybe even the pre-Holyfield version but less likely. Tyson was shot post-Holyfield I and Usyk would box his ears off
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17150
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
Anyone who thinks Usyk is going to stop peak Tyson really needs to adjust their meds.
He couldn't stop Joshua, Chisora, Briedis, Gassiev and Hunter. Say what you want about Tyson, but before Prison, Tyson had a great chin and was difficult to hit cleanly.
He couldn't stop Joshua, Chisora, Briedis, Gassiev and Hunter. Say what you want about Tyson, but before Prison, Tyson had a great chin and was difficult to hit cleanly.
-
Klee Gluckman
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 171
- Joined: 08 Sep 2007, 10:23
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
I don't think the Tucher and Smith survived argument works here. Those guys did not come to win. Tubbs won more rounds of Tyson than Smith and Tubbs beat Snith, but only lasted two rounds against Tyson, whereas Smith went the distance. '
I get roasted for saying this but I think Usyk would get beaten by a few in the 80's. Maybe its nostalgia but I feel like the Heavyweight division has been very disapoiting since Lennox retired. No real big fight to get hyped about.
I get roasted for saying this but I think Usyk would get beaten by a few in the 80's. Maybe its nostalgia but I feel like the Heavyweight division has been very disapoiting since Lennox retired. No real big fight to get hyped about.
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
One little detail a lot of us are probably overlooking is the fact that Usyk is actually the bigger man in this match.
It's natural to think of someone as the smaller man when they move up in weight while the other guy always was at that weight class, but if we take both Tyson and Usyk as they were at their best as Heavyweight Champions, Usyk is both taller and heavier than Tyson. Tyson is still going to have punching power and speed on him, but Usyk's skill and combined with his size is definitely going to prove to be a hard Nights work for Mike.
I still like my original prediction of Tyson by KO around the 8th, but I wouldn't be surprised if he had to come from behind to get it, and considering it's Mike we're talking about and he never came from behind to beat anybody, it's quite possible he just doesn't come back in the fight.
Mike couldn't decision Usyk. It'd be knockout or bust.
It's natural to think of someone as the smaller man when they move up in weight while the other guy always was at that weight class, but if we take both Tyson and Usyk as they were at their best as Heavyweight Champions, Usyk is both taller and heavier than Tyson. Tyson is still going to have punching power and speed on him, but Usyk's skill and combined with his size is definitely going to prove to be a hard Nights work for Mike.
I still like my original prediction of Tyson by KO around the 8th, but I wouldn't be surprised if he had to come from behind to get it, and considering it's Mike we're talking about and he never came from behind to beat anybody, it's quite possible he just doesn't come back in the fight.
Mike couldn't decision Usyk. It'd be knockout or bust.
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
Prime Tyson is everything wrong for Usyk. Styles make fights. Cannot see anything else than Tyson stoppage.
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
Which fights of their both would you consider their primes? Like, if we talk about "best form vs best form".gilgamesh wrote: ↑03 Aug 2026, 22:32 One little detail a lot of us are probably overlooking is the fact that Usyk is actually the bigger man in this match.
It's natural to think of someone as the smaller man when they move up in weight while the other guy always was at that weight class, but if we take both Tyson and Usyk as they were at their best as Heavyweight Champions, Usyk is both taller and heavier than Tyson. Tyson is still going to have punching power and speed on him, but Usyk's skill and combined with his size is definitely going to prove to be a hard Nights work for Mike.
I still like my original prediction of Tyson by KO around the 8th, but I wouldn't be surprised if he had to come from behind to get it, and considering it's Mike we're talking about and he never came from behind to beat anybody, it's quite possible he just doesn't come back in the fight.
Mike couldn't decision Usyk. It'd be knockout or bust.
And here's another scenario. As if current Usyk (who, apparently, wasn't at his best against Rico) meets Tyson of 1996 (who wasn't at his best as well, but went into Holyfield fight as an overwhelming favourite).
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
There's something like a 10 year age gap between the Tyson that fought Holyfield and the Usyk that fought Rico.2128778 wrote: ↑04 Aug 2026, 07:58Which fights of their both would you consider their primes? Like, if we talk about "best form vs best form".gilgamesh wrote: ↑03 Aug 2026, 22:32 One little detail a lot of us are probably overlooking is the fact that Usyk is actually the bigger man in this match.
It's natural to think of someone as the smaller man when they move up in weight while the other guy always was at that weight class, but if we take both Tyson and Usyk as they were at their best as Heavyweight Champions, Usyk is both taller and heavier than Tyson. Tyson is still going to have punching power and speed on him, but Usyk's skill and combined with his size is definitely going to prove to be a hard Nights work for Mike.
I still like my original prediction of Tyson by KO around the 8th, but I wouldn't be surprised if he had to come from behind to get it, and considering it's Mike we're talking about and he never came from behind to beat anybody, it's quite possible he just doesn't come back in the fight.
Mike couldn't decision Usyk. It'd be knockout or bust.
And here's another scenario. As if current Usyk (who, apparently, wasn't at his best against Rico) meets Tyson of 1996 (who wasn't at his best as well, but went into Holyfield fight as an overwhelming favourite).
Tyson's best is generally considered to be 1988 which sounds about right to me. Usyk was probably as good as he'd ever be for the Joshua fights actually. Considering his age I'd think the Usyk from the Joshua fights is probably more physically suited for a fight with a guy like Mike Tyson than any other era of his.
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
Another interesting tactical challenge to consider is that to the best of my memory Mike Tyson never fought a Southpaw. Win or Lose. He never fought one.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm racking my brain trying to think of a Southpaw opponent he may have fought and I'm coming up empty.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm racking my brain trying to think of a Southpaw opponent he may have fought and I'm coming up empty.
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
I think, you are correct. By the way, same with Lennox. I don't think Lewis fought a southpaw. At least, in pros.gilgamesh wrote: ↑04 Aug 2026, 20:38 Another interesting tactical challenge to consider is that to the best of my memory Mike Tyson never fought a Southpaw. Win or Lose. He never fought one.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm racking my brain trying to think of a Southpaw opponent he may have fought and I'm coming up empty.
Re: Mike Tyson vs Oleksandr Usyk
Wow that is actually interestinggilgamesh wrote: ↑04 Aug 2026, 20:38 Another interesting tactical challenge to consider is that to the best of my memory Mike Tyson never fought a Southpaw. Win or Lose. He never fought one.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm racking my brain trying to think of a Southpaw opponent he may have fought and I'm coming up empty.