Hatton -v- Mayweather: The new Leonard -v- Duran?

Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: With modern training techniques, Leonard could have started his career lower in weight, so of course it means he could have won more titles. If he had started his career at lightweight, I'm pretty sure he could still have done what he did against Hagler, after all, it would just be a matter of using modern techniques to drop the extra weight and put it back on again. It seems you don't understand the implications of what you yourself suggested!
Leonard might have been able to start at lightweight but if he did he'd have had an even bigger disadvantage against Duran at that weight. If the Duran loss happened before Leonard was champ would he even have got another shot?

Hearns would have 36hours to recover after a weigh in, which may have given him far more stamina in the frist fight with Leonard and seen Hearns stop or just last the 15 winning a UD. Hagler may have been drained against Ray too and another 36hours to gain the fluid back would have made him stronger and faster against Leonard.

Don't forget if Leonard fights in an era of weight draining he will run into MUCH BIGGER Welters, Light MIddles and Middles. The weight drainers he does face (Hearns) will be MUCH MUCH Stronger

But yes he probably could have won in more weight classes. Mayweather hasn't weight drain at any weight class and always fought the weight he weighed in at pretty much
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: Gatti Judah Baldomir, you are trumping them up!!! Oh how ridiculous, those guys wouldn't have got a sniff of a title in Leonard's era, !
They are the worse better names on PBFs CV BUT they may have grabbed belts back in the day - obviously they wouldn't beat the Hearns/Leonards

Judah is underrated and a potential ATG that has a little something missing that would make him great. Hes fought some of the best though and beaten Spinks, Witter, Corley and hes had 15 world title fights.
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: As for Mayweather, he's got to actually beat Hatton first, before he becomes the man at 140, he's not been the man at anything above 135, where he was indeed dominant. Oscar is a part time fighter, who never proved himself the best at 154 or arguably at anything above 135. After all Mosley beat him at 147, and whilst I thought he beat Trinidad, the result is still there. !
Mayweather was the 'Man' at Welterweight. He won't be the 'Man' at 140lbs technically if he beats Hatton but it is a historic fight because both were 1 and 2 at 140 in 2005 and didn't fight.

I think Delahoya was linear/lineal at 140, 147 and 154. Depends how you define that though because some define it as top2 in the division and others define it as the unification of WBC and WBA belts
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

Terry D wrote:
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
Terry D wrote:I'm sorry PN but Oscar was not lineal at 154. He won a title from a guy who picked it up, the WBC being vacant, against Piccirillo.

Oscar is not the man at 154 nor, therefore, is Floyd.
I was saying Mayweather was lineal at 130, 135 and 147, 135 maybe a slight question mark if it was lineal but for all intents and purposes Castillo was the best for a couple or years before and a couple of years after Mayweather beat him.

Of course if you think Delahoya was robbed against Mosley
, you argue he was rightfully still lineal at 154 :D I think Delahoya was the best at 154, better than Spinks who lost to Judah, better than Dzinderuk who for all his talent is unproven and better than Simms who would lose next time out
I don't!

Lineal belongs to Wright, if he does not move back down, he should go back because he is lacklustre above, we'll need a unification.
Neither do I. Don't think Wright will ever make 154 again now though. HE may go back to 160lbs to grab a piece of the splintered crown when Taylor leaves
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

Terry D wrote: He will have tough competition from Pavlik, Ouma and will have to dislodge Abrahams and Sturm (both overrated though). Quillin is on the up also.
Winky will begin to have problems at any weight now. Hes 35 and if hes put under pressure he may get broken down. AT 154 he will be drained, at 160-168 he will lose his size advantage and be pushed around. I think it was very telling how he didn't want to rematch Jermain Taylor.

At 35 Winky's workrate and speed will diminish and he'll be there for the taking. I think they may throw him in against the Kessler-Calazage winner and he would take a serious beating there as he'll just be too small

The problem Winky has is there are no obvious fights out there for him - 175 - all too big. 168 - Kessler-Calazage winner - the winenr may want Taylor/BHOPs first. AT 160 there is Pavlik if he wins - and this would probably be the perfect scenario for Winky.

If Pavlik doesn't win there is literally no winnable fights out there for him.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

For me, nobody has been 'the man' at Welterweight since Mosley lost to Forrest. The belt has changed hands more times that a tart's phone number.

I'm not talking lineal here, I'm talking about dominating a division. Hatton has for better or worse dominated 140 more than anyone else, and therefore a win over Hatton means a lot more to me than a win over Oscar at 154.

Floyd dominated 135, and proved himself to be the man by taking on all his rivals, since then there's too much cherry picking for me.

Saying Judah is a potential all time great, is like saying Simon Weston is a potential male model. Yes, if you removed all the horrific and very evident flaws in his make-up, Judah could indeed be an all time great, but he is mentally weak, a bully, has poor defence, and lacks ring smarts. what are you left with, handspeed and punchpower....hmmm, not a lot is it.
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:For me, nobody has been 'the man' at Welterweight since Mosley lost to Forrest. The belt has changed hands more times that a tart's phone number.

I'm not talking lineal here, I'm talking about dominating a division. Hatton has for better or worse dominated 140 more than anyone else, and therefore a win over Hatton means a lot more to me than a win over Oscar at 154.

Floyd dominated 135, and proved himself to be the man by taking on all his rivals, since then there's too much cherry picking for me.

Saying Judah is a potential all time great, is like saying Simon Weston is a potential male model. Yes, if you removed all the horrific and very evident flaws in his make-up, Judah could indeed be an all time great, but he is mentally weak, a bully, has poor defence, and lacks ring smarts. what are you left with, handspeed and punchpower....hmmm, not a lot is it.
Mayweathers the man at 147 every bit as much as Hatton is the man at 140 they both beat the man who beat the man.

Delahoya-Mosley-Forrest-Mayorga-Spinks-Judah-Baldomir-Mayweather

The linear championship at Welterweight seems very unlucky and everyone of the winners were upsets other than Mayweather. Thats good news for Hatton.

Hatton hasn't dominated 140lbs because he hasn't dominated the best fighters at that weight like Mayweather (turned down), Cotto, Witter (turned down), Harris. Yes he beat the MAN and he certainly is the linear champion and hence the man to beat. Dominant - you have to clean out the division to claim that

Not sure who Simon Weston is BUT Judahs speed, skill and power are all P4P level. He doesn't have the ex factor but can beat elite level fighters on his day and may have got Cotto if it wasn't for the low blows.

As for Mayweather 'cherry picking' who would you rather he fought that was actually available?
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:For me, nobody has been 'the man' at Welterweight since Mosley lost to Forrest. The belt has changed hands more times that a tart's phone number.

I'm not talking lineal here, I'm talking about dominating a division. Hatton has for better or worse dominated 140 more than anyone else, and therefore a win over Hatton means a lot more to me than a win over Oscar at 154.

Floyd dominated 135, and proved himself to be the man by taking on all his rivals, since then there's too much cherry picking for me.

Saying Judah is a potential all time great, is like saying Simon Weston is a potential male model. Yes, if you removed all the horrific and very evident flaws in his make-up, Judah could indeed be an all time great, but he is mentally weak, a bully, has poor defence, and lacks ring smarts. what are you left with, handspeed and punchpower....hmmm, not a lot is it.
Mayweathers the man at 147 every bit as much as Hatton is the man at 140 they both beat the man who beat the man.

Delahoya-Mosley-Forrest-Mayorga-Spinks-Judah-Baldomir-Mayweather

The linear championship at Welterweight seems very unlucky and everyone of the winners were upsets other than Mayweather. Thats good news for Hatton.

Hatton hasn't dominated 140lbs because he hasn't dominated the best fighters at that weight like Mayweather (turned down), Cotto, Witter (turned down), Harris. Yes he beat the MAN and he certainly is the linear champion and hence the man to beat. Dominant - you have to clean out the division to claim that

Not sure who Simon Weston is BUT Judahs speed, skill and power are all P4P level. He doesn't have the ex factor but can beat elite level fighters on his day and may have got Cotto if it wasn't for the low blows.

As for Mayweather 'cherry picking' who would you rather he fought that was actually available?
You obviously didn't read my post. Lineal titles mean bollock all. I said there has been nobody dominant at Welterweight for a long time. Tszyu was dominant, Hatton has beaten Tszyu, and Hatton has since continued to win at the weight. That is what makes Hatton the man at 140. Lineal titles are just points of contention for anaraktion over boxing. It doesn't mean a great deal in this day and age. Stop obsessing over Lineal titles, and ask yourself who of the present campaigners at 140 has proven the most, it is Hatton by far.

Bollocks, there is nothing P4P about Judah. He is quick, hits hard and moves a lot, that's it. there's no such thing as P4P speed, because in isolation it is irrelevant. It doesn't matter how fast you are if you have shit timing, or your chin is fragile, or if you have zero power, or you have no stamina. P4P fighters are built on achievement, not on attributes. Judah has lost every single time he has stepped up in class, and lost to a journeyman, albeit a decent journeyman on a good run in Baldomir.

What elite level fighters has Judah beaten then? Aside from a totally green and negative Witter, or perhaps a vastly overrated Corley? Those are not elite level wins, Judah hasn't got any. His best win is over Spinks, who is world class, but not elite, elite level is the P4Pers of this world, which Spinks isn't and never was.

Your clutching at straws here trying to big Judah up, but there's nothing to big up. He showed a lot of heart against Cotto, but he got absolutely mangled in there, and the fight perfectly illustrated what's wrong with Judah, amongst other things, when his fight plan doesn't work, he has no ability to adapt and survive, he simply gets bludgeoned. He is one dimensional mentally, and that is what seperates the top level guys from everyone else, is that mental aspect.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

I agree with the above, on lineal titles, the light welter and welter situations, and Judah's nonexistant p4p standing.

Judah showed a lot of promise, but Kostya took it from him. Tszyu became a great fighter. Zab can sometimes win close to the top level thanks to talent, but loses all the big ones thanks to temperament.

There is a romantic love for Zab based on what might have been. How many US writers called Cotto-Zab a "classic", just because he was brave and staged THREE big assaults over TWELVE rounds?

Mayweather isn't to welters what Tszyu was to junior welters. To REALLY call Floyd the welter ruler he'd have to show something against Cotto or Williams or someone of that ilk. It was a brief stay and obviously Judah and Baldo who he beat went on to lose to Cotto and Forrest.

ok, he won a junior middle title belt, a very good achievement, but what about all these prime fighters who are the "contenders" to the "lineal crown."
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: You obviously didn't read my post. Lineal titles mean bollock all. I said there has been nobody dominant at Welterweight for a long time. Tszyu was dominant, Hatton has beaten Tszyu, and Hatton has since continued to win at the weight. That is what makes Hatton the man at 140. Lineal titles are just points of contention for anaraktion over boxing. It doesn't mean a great deal in this day and age. Stop obsessing over Lineal titles, and ask yourself who of the present campaigners at 140 has proven the most, it is Hatton by far. .
So if lineal means nothing Hattons just another belt holder in many. Tyszu was dominant but he wasn't dominant in 2005 when Hatton beat him because he didn't beat a worthy contender since 2001 (outside of a past prime B Class fighter in Mitchell). He was stripped of his WBC, WBA belts because he was innactive and not fighting the best.

Mayweather, Cotto, Harris, Gatti, Hatton were all pretenders to Tyszus throne, which he had curtesy of the Judah win in 2001. Since 2001 Tyszus resume is poor - Old Leija, C Class TAckie, Past Prime B Class Mitchell. Thats is not dominance

The reason Hatton has a name is because hes linear, Tyszu was the champ before him.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

There's no point continuing this discussion further. Kostya Tszyu was clearly the best 140 lber in the world, there was not one other fighter who could seriously lay claim to that title whilst he was still active.

If you wish to obsess over lineal titles, that's your business.

Mayweather is not the man at anything above 135, Hatton is the man at 140, and despite the fact they are fighting at 147, the winner is the man at 140 as a result in my book, as both men fought at the weight and neither man is really a fully fledged welterweight.

As said by Auto, we have yet to see Mayweather engage with a genuine leading light in the Welterweight division, a career long, fully fledged, top level Welterweight.

All this belt hopping muddies the waters and confuses people.
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
What elite level fighters has Judah beaten then? Aside from a totally green and negative Witter, or perhaps a vastly overrated Corley? Those are not elite level wins, Judah hasn't got any. His best win is over Spinks, who is world class, but not elite, elite level is the P4Pers of this world, which Spinks isn't and never was. .
Judah put away Spinks and arguably beat him in the first fight (I scored it to him). Spinks has beat the no1 at 147, the no1 at 154 and many had him beating Jermaine Taylor at 160. Not an elite boxer?

Judah has his frailties and I don't proclaim him to be 1 of the great but some of the things he does his handspeed and power is of P4P note, his stamina and punch picking are not. Judahs done in terms of big fights now unless he drops back down to 140.

Whos fought better comp than Judah? With Mayweather, Tyszu, Cotto, Spinks, Witter, Corley, Millet, Green, Ward. Hes been in with pretty much everyone, not beaten the best but taken some pretty good scalps

Some of the names Judah put away at 140 were decent contenders. And 15 world title fights is certainly noteworthy
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:There's no point continuing this discussion further. Kostya Tszyu was clearly the best 140 lber in the world, there was not one other fighter who could seriously lay claim to that title whilst he was still active.
.
And whys that? Because he was undisputed/linear in 2001 after unyfing, after 2001 he did little to nothing against top guys mainly because of injury

Spinks became undisputed/linear too and hence after him we have the MAN at 147. Its the exact same scenario, there is no difference other than you may claim Spinks/Judah/Baldomir were not as good, which they probably weren't. But then again who was better - Margarito? hes hardly proven it
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
What elite level fighters has Judah beaten then? Aside from a totally green and negative Witter, or perhaps a vastly overrated Corley? Those are not elite level wins, Judah hasn't got any. His best win is over Spinks, who is world class, but not elite, elite level is the P4Pers of this world, which Spinks isn't and never was. .
Judah put away Spinks and arguably beat him in the first fight (I scored it to him). Spinks has beat the no1 at 147, the no1 at 154 and many had him beating Jermaine Taylor at 160. Not an elite boxer?

Judah has his frailties and I don't proclaim him to be 1 of the great but some of the things he does his handspeed and power is of P4P note, his stamina and punch picking are not. Judahs done in terms of big fights now unless he drops back down to 140.

Whos fought better comp than Judah? With Mayweather, Tyszu, Cotto, Spinks, Witter, Corley, Millet, Green, Ward. Hes been in with pretty much everyone, not beaten the best but taken some pretty good scalps

Some of the names Judah put away at 140 were decent contenders. And 15 world title fights is certainly noteworthy
I think we are going to have to agree to disagree. I can't be arsed any more.
mattyp151
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1195
Joined: 12 Oct 2005, 10:51

Post by mattyp151 »

I think Hatton's witty words will shoot right over the head of Floyd. A lot of Americans don't "get" dry British humor, and if you do, it's fvcking beautiful.

Ricky had a fantastic comment to the Boston media after the Collazo fight when asked why he was holding so much. His answer: "Should I just let him hit me next time then?"....there was no laughter, but personally, I found it hysterical.
Southpaw Stylist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1484
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 04:50

Post by Southpaw Stylist »

LOL @ thinking Mayweather is as dumb as SRL.

Great boxer, but he got into dumb brawls to please the fans. Floyd will box this cat's head off.
Arbachakov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 380
Joined: 15 Apr 2006, 12:35

Post by Arbachakov »

What dumb brawls did Leonard get into?.
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Post by Carbo »

Arbachakov wrote:What dumb brawls did Leonard get into?.
Well, fighting Duran as he did first time out wasn't the smartest thing to do, but lets just face fu-king facts for a moment, shall we? Leonard stood toe to toe with the, sorry, The master brawler, and held his own.

He couldn't make his way inside Hearn's reach and jab, so he stood flat-footed, inside the pocket, in range of the Hitman's murderous punches so he could find room for his own counters, and won.

Those who say Mayweather is on a par with Leonard need to take a long, hard look at themselves.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27497
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

Why is it always Duran's fault why Ray beat him in the rematch.. What about the taticle shift that Leonard used. Duran at Welter and beyond HATED movers... remember Kirklaind Laing.

I seriously believe that Leonard style wise would have beaten Duran 9 times out of 10... Its just we saw 1 time in which Leonard fought the wrong fight.

Leonard showed in fight one that he could fight with him at almost an even level and that aside from a moment in the 2nd Duran didn't have the power to hurt Ray. Sure a Duran would have done a better job had he been in shape, but I always envisage a carbon copy of Ali vs Frazier 3, without the swellings and the toughness. Ray winning the early rounds, Duran coming back.. but Ray winning a close but clear decision.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Carbo wrote:
Arbachakov wrote:What dumb brawls did Leonard get into?.
Well, fighting Duran as he did first time out wasn't the smartest thing to do, but lets just face fu-king facts for a moment, shall we? Leonard stood toe to toe with the, sorry, The master brawler, and held his own.

He couldn't make his way inside Hearn's reach and jab, so he stood flat-footed, inside the pocket, in range of the Hitman's murderous punches so he could find room for his own counters, and won.

Those who say Mayweather is on a par with Leonard need to take a long, hard look at themselves.
Thankyou!

Mayweather against Hearns at welter....jesus, no frigging way, there is no way he could have pulled that pick and poke act against someoen as adroit and well schooled as hearns, and no way would he have ever dared stand in the pokcet.
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: Thankyou!

Mayweather against Hearns at welter....jesus, no frigging way, there is no way he could have pulled that pick and poke act against someoen as adroit and well schooled as hearns, and no way would he have ever dared stand in the pokcet.
Yes but a fairer match up would be Mayweather against Arguello/Pep/Sanchez/Chavez at 130 or against Duran/Whitaker at 135 or Pryor/Benitez/Tyszu at 140

Mayweathers a very small welterweight and clearly blown up at the weight
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Post by Carbo »

Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote: Thankyou!

Mayweather against Hearns at welter....jesus, no frigging way, there is no way he could have pulled that pick and poke act against someoen as adroit and well schooled as hearns, and no way would he have ever dared stand in the pokcet.
Yes but a fairer match up would be Mayweather against Arguello/Pep/Sanchez/Chavez at 130 or against Duran/Whitaker at 135 or Pryor/Benitez/Tyszu at 140

Mayweathers a very small welterweight and clearly blown up at the weight
Not too many of those Mayweather wins, my friend.[/b]
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45233
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote: Thankyou!

Mayweather against Hearns at welter....jesus, no frigging way, there is no way he could have pulled that pick and poke act against someoen as adroit and well schooled as hearns, and no way would he have ever dared stand in the pokcet.
Yes but a fairer match up would be Mayweather against Arguello/Pep/Sanchez/Chavez at 130 or against Duran/Whitaker at 135 or Pryor/Benitez/Tyszu at 140

Mayweathers a very small welterweight and clearly blown up at the weight
I think Mayweather is a notch below all of those guys, it's not a huge notch, Mayweather is after all a very very good fighter, but not on a par with those men.

Whittaker is the fighter Mayweather resembles the most, but Whittaker had better movement and could command the centre of the ring better than Floyd.

Think about how well a past it and crack raddled Whittaker did against a peak Oscar DeLaHoya, I've no doubt he'd have prevailed had they met a couple of years before.

For what it's worth, I also put Oscar a notch below all those people, but there's no great shame in that, as those guys are all time greats in their divisions.
Phenomenal-Nutrition
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5185
Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53

Post by Phenomenal-Nutrition »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote: Thankyou!

Mayweather against Hearns at welter....jesus, no frigging way, there is no way he could have pulled that pick and poke act against someoen as adroit and well schooled as hearns, and no way would he have ever dared stand in the pokcet.
Yes but a fairer match up would be Mayweather against Arguello/Pep/Sanchez/Chavez at 130 or against Duran/Whitaker at 135 or Pryor/Benitez/Tyszu at 140

Mayweathers a very small welterweight and clearly blown up at the weight
I think Mayweather is a notch below all of those guys, it's not a huge notch, Mayweather is after all a very very good fighter, but not on a par with those men.

Whittaker is the fighter Mayweather resembles the most, but Whittaker had better movement and could command the centre of the ring better than Floyd.

Think about how well a past it and crack raddled Whittaker did against a peak Oscar DeLaHoya, I've no doubt he'd have prevailed had they met a couple of years before.

For what it's worth, I also put Oscar a notch below all those people, but there's no great shame in that, as those guys are all time greats in their divisions.
Whitaker I certainly rate above Mayweather. The rest I rate Mayweather either on par or above. I'd see them going as follows:

Arguello - M UD
Pep - M UD (too big?)
Sanchez - M UD
Chavez - M UD
Duran - Duran 2-1 in a series
Whitaker - Whitaker UD
Pryor - Pryor UD
Benitez - M UD
Tyszu - M UD

Maybe I'm caught up and rate Mayweather too high but I think were witnessing a very special masterclass boxer
Carbo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1827
Joined: 23 Nov 2006, 14:25

Post by Carbo »

Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote: Arguello - M UD
Pep - M UD (too big?)
Sanchez - M UD
Chavez - M UD
Duran - Duran 2-1 in a series
Whitaker - Whitaker UD
Pryor - Pryor UD
Benitez - M UD
Tyszu - M UD

Maybe I'm caught up and rate Mayweather too high but I think were witnessing a very special masterclass boxer
Ha-ha-hahaha-haha-haha-ha-hahaha-haha-haha-ha-hahaha-haha-haha-ha-hahaha-haha-haha-ha-hahaha-haha-haha-ha-hahaha-haha-haha-ha-hahaha-haha-haha-ha-hahaha-haha-haha-ha-hahaha-haha-haha...etc
Post Reply